fromolwyoming
Well-known member
We didn't have much of an offense under DC if went up against any defense with anything resembling a pulse. And most of that offense was because Brett is such a playmaker, in spite of DC.
JimmyDimes said:I don't think I've seen a world of hurt comment about the QB position by anyone who attended the spring game. And all indications are the team doesn't need a superb QB to run the offense....just someone who won't make stupid mistakes.SDPokeFan said:I wasn't at the spring game, but by reading the comments on here and talking to those who saw it, we are in a world of hurt at the quarterback position. On a lighter note, everyone have a great summer. Can't wait until football season!
SDSU had to use a walk on QB early on, and still won more games than us, because he didn't make many mistakes, but was excatly a great QB either.PotatoCreekPete said:JimmyDimes said:I don't think I've seen a world of hurt comment about the QB position by anyone who attended the spring game. And all indications are the team doesn't need a superb QB to run the offense....just someone who won't make stupid mistakes.SDPokeFan said:I wasn't at the spring game, but by reading the comments on here and talking to those who saw it, we are in a world of hurt at the quarterback position. On a lighter note, everyone have a great summer. Can't wait until football season!
You need someone that is going to do a bit more than not make mistakes. Why have someone back there if that is all that is required of them? You make the position sound like it is almost unimportant in Bohl's offense. Unfortunately, Bohl doesn't share your views, he has stated more than a few times that you need to have superior talent at three positions to be successful: QB, CB & DT.
EVERY college team in America will be in a situation during the season where they need the QB to make a play when they are behind in a game or it is 3rd and long and the clock is running out, and in these situations you need a superior athlete who is going to have to do more than just not make mistakes.
You keep downgrading the need to have a talented QB if that is what makes you feel good, but again Coach Bohl doesn't share your opinion.
fromolwyoming said:SDSU had to use a walk on QB early on, and still won more games than us, because he didn't make many mistakes, but was excatly a great QB either.PotatoCreekPete said:JimmyDimes said:I don't think I've seen a world of hurt comment about the QB position by anyone who attended the spring game. And all indications are the team doesn't need a superb QB to run the offense....just someone who won't make stupid mistakes.SDPokeFan said:I wasn't at the spring game, but by reading the comments on here and talking to those who saw it, we are in a world of hurt at the quarterback position. On a lighter note, everyone have a great summer. Can't wait until football season!
You need someone that is going to do a bit more than not make mistakes. Why have someone back there if that is all that is required of them? You make the position sound like it is almost unimportant in Bohl's offense. Unfortunately, Bohl doesn't share your views, he has stated more than a few times that you need to have superior talent at three positions to be successful: QB, CB & DT.
EVERY college team in America will be in a situation during the season where they need the QB to make a play when they are behind in a game or it is 3rd and long and the clock is running out, and in these situations you need a superior athlete who is going to have to do more than just not make mistakes.
You keep downgrading the need to have a talented QB if that is what makes you feel good, but again Coach Bohl doesn't share your opinion.
There is reason for optimism on defense, but you are correct. We've been saying/hoping for years now that the defense as a whole and offensive line improve, and more than once fans have been convinced "this is the year" and it ended up clearly not being the case. I expect improvement on defense, at least somewhat....but if they struggle again (especially with that Tampa 2) I'm not going to be stunned or upset. JMO, but this is a bigger rebuilding task for Bohl than some let on to.Pokes Forever said:Offense probably will suck especially without a reliable QB......wasn't real stellar against teams other than Idaho, AF and other lousy defenses....the real question is the defense going to give up 52 at homecoming and get rolled by everyone from Hawaii to SJSt? Will we be able to stay within five TD's of Boise and Fresno? Will we have another Nationally Televised game where we give up 48? It sucked losing Smith and Thompson but we have way more issues to address on D. Just my two cents.
Amen......could be a difficult couple of years ahead.......hoping I'm wrong....will wait and see. Go Pokes!!!!!J-Rod said:There is reason for optimism on defense, but you are correct. We've been saying/hoping for years now that the defense as a whole and offensive line improve, and more than once fans have been convinced "this is the year" and it ended up clearly not being the case. I expect improvement on defense, at least somewhat....but if they struggle again (especially with that Tampa 2) I'm not going to be stunned or upset. JMO, but this is a bigger rebuilding task for Bohl than some let on to.Pokes Forever said:Offense probably will suck especially without a reliable QB......wasn't real stellar against teams other than Idaho, AF and other lousy defenses....the real question is the defense going to give up 52 at homecoming and get rolled by everyone from Hawaii to SJSt? Will we be able to stay within five TD's of Boise and Fresno? Will we have another Nationally Televised game where we give up 48? It sucked losing Smith and Thompson but we have way more issues to address on D. Just my two cents.
Boise made a killing in their prime under Yates in the 4-2-5. 3-4 doesn't seem to work well for any non-AQ school to be honest.....we'll see if it lasts for Utah State.fromolwyoming said:A bit off tangent, but the tampa 2 with a 4-2-5 defense in ncaa 14 with the right players is actually pretty effective.
And the 3-4 is pretty worthless.
I've held some pretty high octane offenses to just over 200 yards of offense and 10 or fewer points. Pretty interesting.J-Rod said:Boise made a killing in their prime under Yates in the 4-2-5. 3-4 doesn't seem to work well for any non-AQ school to be honest.....we'll see if it lasts for Utah State.fromolwyoming said:A bit off tangent, but the tampa 2 with a 4-2-5 defense in ncaa 14 with the right players is actually pretty effective.
And the 3-4 is pretty worthless.
Did you watch that drive? 18 plays, averaging 2.5 ypc. The run blocking was not good for most of that drive, yet it went 18 plays.HR_Poke said:Lots of run, run, pass, punt in our future.... Running game is great if you have an o-line that can hold a block.
So bohl brought his entire offense with him scholarships and all? We couldn't run or pass against our own defense this spring and you are acting like somehow we are magically going to be miles better all of the sudden.joshvanklomp said:Did you watch that drive? 18 plays, averaging 2.5 ypc. The run blocking was not good for most of that drive, yet it went 18 plays.HR_Poke said:Lots of run, run, pass, punt in our future.... Running game is great if you have an o-line that can hold a block.