McPeachy said:No doubt about that. Would rather be "left at home" than what happened to Boise.
Then again, fuck em, they deserve it. And Craig can still kiss my ass, even though the laughs are on him in this whole deal as well.
Wyokie said:McPeachy said:No doubt about that. Would rather be "left at home" than what happened to Boise.
Then again, fuck em, they deserve it. And Craig can still kiss my ass, even though the laughs are on him in this whole deal as well.
100% agree, McPeachy.
But still...never liked that dumb assed NCAA rule about shutting things down for 30 minutes if lightning flashes within an 8 mile radius and after each lightning flash afterwards, the 30 minute thing restarts. Plain dumb. I could see it if it was within, say, 3-4 miles but still...
WestWYOPoke said:Wyokie said:McPeachy said:No doubt about that. Would rather be "left at home" than what happened to Boise.
Then again, fuck em, they deserve it. And Craig can still kiss my ass, even though the laughs are on him in this whole deal as well.
100% agree, McPeachy.
But still...never liked that dumb assed NCAA rule about shutting things down for 30 minutes if lightning flashes within an 8 mile radius and after each lightning flash afterwards, the 30 minute thing restarts. Plain dumb. I could see it if it was within, say, 3-4 miles but still...
It's not an NCAA rule, it's an institutional rule that is pretty much unanimously enforced. Some schools use 6 miles, others use 8. Also, the reason behind it is that lightning can travel up to 6 miles away from where it originates, so theoretically if you are <6 miles from a strike, you are in reach of a potential strike.
Asmodeanreborn said:I'm not sure which is worse: having your game canceled, or being ridiculed for playing in the worst bowl game ever like Cal and TCU.
Wyokie said:WestWYOPoke said:Wyokie said:McPeachy said:No doubt about that. Would rather be "left at home" than what happened to Boise.
Then again, fuck em, they deserve it. And Craig can still kiss my ass, even though the laughs are on him in this whole deal as well.
100% agree, McPeachy.
But still...never liked that dumb assed NCAA rule about shutting things down for 30 minutes if lightning flashes within an 8 mile radius and after each lightning flash afterwards, the 30 minute thing restarts. Plain dumb. I could see it if it was within, say, 3-4 miles but still...
It's not an NCAA rule, it's an institutional rule that is pretty much unanimously enforced. Some schools use 6 miles, others use 8. Also, the reason behind it is that lightning can travel up to 6 miles away from where it originates, so theoretically if you are <6 miles from a strike, you are in reach of a potential strike.
That's interesting since I read an article about the game being canned earlier saying that it was a NCAA rule, not institutional. Plus this game was on neutral territory. So which institution made the call if indeed it is an institutional rule?
Wyovanian said:Just out of curiosity, anyone know how many people died in lightning strikes before this "rule" was implemented? How about how many people have been seriously injured or killed by opposing fans? How about how many have been injured or killed while driving to or from a game?
So, in other words, the rule quite possibly endangers people more than it makes safe.Cornpoke said:Wyovanian said:Just out of curiosity, anyone know how many people died in lightning strikes before this "rule" was implemented? How about how many people have been seriously injured or killed by opposing fans? How about how many have been injured or killed while driving to or from a game?
Statically I'm sure it's pretty low. There was a lightning strike not too long ago at a NASCAR race that killed some fans. I had close encounter at a golf course once, since then I don't take any chances. Lee Trevino was struck by lightning during a tournament and was just fine. Odd how some people can just walk away from a lightning strike.
Wyovanian said:So, in other words, the rule quite possibly endangers people more than it makes safe.Cornpoke said:Wyovanian said:Just out of curiosity, anyone know how many people died in lightning strikes before this "rule" was implemented? How about how many people have been seriously injured or killed by opposing fans? How about how many have been injured or killed while driving to or from a game?
Statically I'm sure it's pretty low. There was a lightning strike not too long ago at a NASCAR race that killed some fans. I had close encounter at a golf course once, since then I don't take any chances. Lee Trevino was struck by lightning during a tournament and was just fine. Odd how some people can just walk away from a lightning strike.
Asmodeanreborn said:I knew two people who were hit by lightning when I was a kid - both survived. My grandma's friend didn't really have any side effects aside from his hearing getting even worse. The other dude (who ignored the warning bell on the golf course) had his vocal cords seriously screwed up. He sounded almost like Stephen Hawking, except without the voice box.
WestWYOPoke said:Wyovanian said:So, in other words, the rule quite possibly endangers people more than it makes safe.Cornpoke said:Wyovanian said:Just out of curiosity, anyone know how many people died in lightning strikes before this "rule" was implemented? How about how many people have been seriously injured or killed by opposing fans? How about how many have been injured or killed while driving to or from a game?
Statically I'm sure it's pretty low. There was a lightning strike not too long ago at a NASCAR race that killed some fans. I had close encounter at a golf course once, since then I don't take any chances. Lee Trevino was struck by lightning during a tournament and was just fine. Odd how some people can just walk away from a lightning strike.
How do you figure?
Wyovanian said:WestWYOPoke said:Wyovanian said:So, in other words, the rule quite possibly endangers people more than it makes safe.Cornpoke said:Wyovanian said:Just out of curiosity, anyone know how many people died in lightning strikes before this "rule" was implemented? How about how many people have been seriously injured or killed by opposing fans? How about how many have been injured or killed while driving to or from a game?
Statically I'm sure it's pretty low. There was a lightning strike not too long ago at a NASCAR race that killed some fans. I had close encounter at a golf course once, since then I don't take any chances. Lee Trevino was struck by lightning during a tournament and was just fine. Odd how some people can just walk away from a lightning strike.
How do you figure?
Seems to me that people entering or leaving a stadium and driving to and from a stadium are at far greater risk than someone sitting in a stadium with lightning within 8 miles. People leaving are more likely to be frustrated and irritable as well, which makes them more prone to poor decisions and bad driving.
I honestly don't believe the number of people killed by lightning in a football stadium before the rule would exceed the number of fingers on a normal human hand.