• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

Golf Teams?

Baseball sucks.

"I enjoy comparing baseball and football:

Baseball is a nineteenth-century pastoral game.
Football is a twentieth-century technological struggle.

Baseball is played on a diamond, in a park.The baseball park!
Football is played on a gridiron, in a stadium, sometimes called Soldier Field or War Memorial Stadium.

Baseball begins in the spring, the season of new life.
Football begins in the fall, when everything's dying.

In football you wear a helmet.
In baseball you wear a cap.

Football is concerned with downs - what down is it?
Baseball is concerned with ups - who's up?

In football you receive a penalty.
In baseball you make an error.

In football the specialist comes in to kick.
In baseball the specialist comes in to relieve somebody.

Football has hitting, clipping, spearing, piling on, personal fouls, late hitting and unnecessary roughness.
Baseball has the sacrifice.

Football is played in any kind of weather: rain, snow, sleet, hail, fog...
In baseball, if it rains, we don't go out to play.

Baseball has the seventh inning stretch.
Football has the two minute warning.

Baseball has no time limit: we don't know when it's gonna end - might have extra innings.
Football is rigidly timed, and it will end even if we've got to go to sudden death.

In baseball, during the game, in the stands, there's kind of a picnic feeling; emotions may run high or low, but there's not too much unpleasantness.
In football, during the game in the stands, you can be sure that at least twenty-seven times you're capable of taking the life of a fellow human being.

And finally, the objectives of the two games are completely different:

In football the object is for the quarterback, also known as the field general, to be on target with his aerial assault, riddling the defense by hitting his receivers with deadly accuracy in spite of the blitz, even if he has to use shotgun. With short bullet passes and long bombs, he marches his troops into enemy territory, balancing this aerial assault with a sustained ground attack that punches holes in the forward wall of the enemy's defensive line.

In baseball the object is to go home! And to be safe! - I hope I'll be safe at home!" -George Carlin
 
George Carlin was funny, but not everything he said "hit a homerun". ;)

There is no point in arguing...Football fans are always gonna think they are right and baseball fans are always gonna think they are right.
You will NEVER truly convince someone that you are right in this debate, only just annoy people until they say alright shut the fuck up.
 
BeaverPoke said:
George Carlin was funny, but not everything he said "hit a homerun". ;)

There is no point in arguing...Football fans are always gonna think they are right and baseball fans are always gonna think they are right.
You will NEVER truly convince someone that you are right in this debate, only just annoy people until they say alright shut the fuck up.
You don't have to be a football fan to think baseball sucks.
 
Wyovanian said:
BeaverPoke said:
George Carlin was funny, but not everything he said "hit a homerun". ;)

There is no point in arguing...Football fans are always gonna think they are right and baseball fans are always gonna think they are right.
You will NEVER truly convince someone that you are right in this debate, only just annoy people until they say alright shut the fuck up.
You don't have to be a football fan to think baseball sucks.

And you don't have to be a baseball fan to think football sucks....
It goes both ways...
:roll:
 
Wyovanian said:
In baseball, during the game, in the stands, there's kind of a picnic feeling; emotions may run high or low, but there's not too much unpleasantness.
In football, during the game in the stands, you can be sure that at least twenty-seven times you're capable of taking the life of a fellow human being.

:lol: :lol:
 
BeaverPoke said:
Wyovanian said:
BeaverPoke said:
George Carlin was funny, but not everything he said "hit a homerun". ;)

There is no point in arguing...Football fans are always gonna think they are right and baseball fans are always gonna think they are right.
You will NEVER truly convince someone that you are right in this debate, only just annoy people until they say alright shut the fuck up.
You don't have to be a football fan to think baseball sucks.

And you don't have to be a baseball fan to think football sucks....
It goes both ways...
:roll:
You'll have a hard time finding more anti-fans of football than baseball. It's boring as hell to watch. They invented concessions to get people to stick around.
 
BeaverPoke said:
fromolwyoming said:
BeaverPoke said:
Fuck all the baseball haters...
Baseball is the best sport there is.
And to go to a game because of cheerleaders...jesus just might as well sit at home and look up porn while watching the game on game tracker.

I wish UW had a baseball team.
Baseball is on par with golf. In that, it is about as exciting as watching grass grow or paint dry.

It's okay if you don't like baseball, it's kind of a smart person sport.
Apparently, however, one needn't be a smart person to be a fan. I think Mr. Carlin would've found that wonderfully inclusive and been happy for you.
 
If you ever been to an NFL Game, it's safe to assume the education of level of fans in the MLB are much higher. I'd be curious to see any stats on such stuff but I'm too busy and lazy.

People always talk about the intellectual aspect of football, but the bottom is, if you have bigger stronger faster players, you are winning 95% of the time.
 
laxwyo said:
If you ever been to an NFL Game, it's safe to assume the education of level of fans in the MLB are much higher. I'd be curious to see any stats on such stuff but I'm too busy and lazy.

People always talk about the intellectual aspect of football, but the bottom is, if you have bigger stronger faster players, you are winning 95% of the time.

Haha couldn't have said it better.
If your QB can throw it, you have him throw it, if your RB is able to run the ball hard, you hand it off.
Don't believe it? Look at Adrian Petersons year last season, and look at Broncos last season with Peyton vs. running the ball the entire season with Tebow.

And saying more people like football means it is the better sport....for all you republicans out there...most people thought Obama was the better choice...twice...does that mean he was better? :lol:

Go to a football game you get a bunch of pissed off fans that all just wanna see people beat up on eachother and have attention spans of children.
Baseball though, that shit takes patience, it's the biggest mental game there is.


anyways like I said earlier...no one is gonna convince anyone else. I'm just waiting for someone to say shut the fuck up I don't care.
 
most people thought Obama was the better choice...twice...does that mean he was better?
Not to get too political, but he was better than his competition. It's not saying much, but that just speaks to what the GOP can put out for a candidate.
 
fromolwyoming said:
Not to get too political, but he was better than his competition. It's not saying much, but that just speaks to what the GOP can put out for a candidate.
Uh oh! He went there!

youre-gonna-die-clown-happy-gilmore.gif
 
J-Rod said:
fromolwyoming said:
Not to get too political, but he was better than his competition. It's not saying much, but that just speaks to what the GOP can put out for a candidate.
Uh oh! He went there!

LOL :rofl:

And what really scares the shit outta me is fromolwyoming is right.
 
J-Rod said:
fromolwyoming said:
Not to get too political, but he was better than his competition. It's not saying much, but that just speaks to what the GOP can put out for a candidate.
Uh oh! He went there!

youre-gonna-die-clown-happy-gilmore.gif

Hahaha...Saying "not to get too politcal" then saying Obama is better than the GOP canidates (which I agree with) is like saying "no offense" then saying something really offensive.

Hahaha I shouldn't have even said that, my point was that here, especially on a board where everyone here is a football fan, just having the majority of a small group thinking one sport is better doesn't prove it. And considering this is a Wyoming board, and the state of Wyo is very republican, I figured, most people on this board would be anti-Obama and since Obama won two elections in a row...well you get my point. If not...oh well I don't give a shit anymore. End this thread before it gets stupid.
 
BeaverPoke said:
J-Rod said:
fromolwyoming said:
Not to get too political, but he was better than his competition. It's not saying much, but that just speaks to what the GOP can put out for a candidate.
Uh oh! He went there!

youre-gonna-die-clown-happy-gilmore.gif

Hahaha...Saying "not to get too politcal" then saying Obama is better than the GOP canidates (which I agree with) is like saying "no offense" then saying something really offensive.

Hahaha I shouldn't have even said that, my point was that here, especially on a board where everyone here is a football fan, just having the majority of a small group thinking one sport is better doesn't prove it. And considering this is a Wyoming board, and the state of Wyo is very republican, I figured, most people on this board would be anti-Obama and since Obama won two elections in a row...well you get my point. If not...oh well I don't give a shit anymore. End this thread before it gets stupid.

Too late now!
 
Holy shit...thread derail.

Point is...UW doesn't compete at golf. Never has. Right now the ladies team is in 15th place in a 15 team field. They do the same every week, and so do the men. Perennial losers...both golf teams.

Why do the golf teams get a pass? At least UW baseball was effing competitive. So could women's softball be. And don't give me that weather shit as a reason. Baseball could be enough of a revenue sport to offset the cost difference from having last place golf teams. But that may too forward thinking for some. Too agressive. Too ambitious.
 
McPeachy said:
Holy shit...thread derail.

Point is...UW doesn't compete at golf. Never has. Right now the ladies team is in 15th place in a 15 team field. They do the same every week, and so do the men. Perennial losers...both golf teams.

Why do the golf teams get a pass? At least UW baseball was effing competitive. So could women's softball be. And don't give me that weather shit as a reason. Baseball could be enough of a revenue sport to offset the cost difference from having last place golf teams. But that may too forward thinking for some. Too agressive. Too ambitious.

You are too agressive and too ambitious, especially talking about having a winning program here in Laramie. How dare you.
But seriously. UW should have baseball. End of discussion. No reason not to.
 
BeaverPoke said:
McPeachy said:
Holy shit...thread derail.

Point is...UW doesn't compete at golf. Never has. Right now the ladies team is in 15th place in a 15 team field. They do the same every week, and so do the men. Perennial losers...both golf teams.

Why do the golf teams get a pass? At least UW baseball was effing competitive. So could women's softball be. And don't give me that weather shit as a reason. Baseball could be enough of a revenue sport to offset the cost difference from having last place golf teams. But that may too forward thinking for some. Too agressive. Too ambitious.

You are too agressive and too ambitious, especially talking about having a winning program here in Laramie. How dare you.
But seriously. UW should have baseball. End of discussion. No reason not to.

In order to have baseball though, you have to fund it and you have to meet Title IX obligations (adding Women's Softball would be the logical choice to do so). Operating expenditures could be partially (but not totally) offset by the discontinuation of the golf teams. Baseball/Softball will be quite a bit more expensive (more coaches, more support staff, more events/games = more travel, etc.), but at least that provides a chunk. The remaining operating funds will need to come from somewhere else in the department. That likely means cuts in Football and Men's Basketball budgets.

There are also infrastructure upgrades required if we want to get back into the sport. Where does that money come from? We could discontinue the planned renovations to the AA and redirect the funds towards baseball/softball.

IMHO, we should focus on funding Football/Men's Basketball to the best of our ability rather than redirecting funds towards starting new programs. If those sports were consistently successful, they could generate additional revenue (Imagine the revenue difference between 10k per game and 6k per game in the AA) that might open up the possibility of athletic department expansion. I am not saying that is likely. Keep in mind our athletic department exists solely due to subsidies providing by the general university fund (and by extension the State of Wyoming, also students).
 
NowherePoke said:

The article left out the quote(s) from the asshat legislator that has a similar vision pattern as the AD. That would be "tunnel" and "smalltime" by the way.

It doesn't / wouldn't take that much. Anyone know what UW dumps into Jacoby GC & the UW golf teams each year total?

Sell Jacoby to the City, lose the golf teams and all their luggage, update Cowboy with turf, and move on.
 
NowherePoke said:
BeaverPoke said:
McPeachy said:
Holy shit...thread derail.

Point is...UW doesn't compete at golf. Never has. Right now the ladies team is in 15th place in a 15 team field. They do the same every week, and so do the men. Perennial losers...both golf teams.

Why do the golf teams get a pass? At least UW baseball was effing competitive. So could women's softball be. And don't give me that weather shit as a reason. Baseball could be enough of a revenue sport to offset the cost difference from having last place golf teams. But that may too forward thinking for some. Too agressive. Too ambitious.

You are too agressive and too ambitious, especially talking about having a winning program here in Laramie. How dare you.
But seriously. UW should have baseball. End of discussion. No reason not to.

In order to have baseball though, you have to fund it and you have to meet Title IX obligations (adding Women's Softball would be the logical choice to do so). Operating expenditures could be partially (but not totally) offset by the discontinuation of the golf teams. Baseball/Softball will be quite a bit more expensive (more coaches, more support staff, more events/games = more travel, etc.), but at least that provides a chunk. The remaining operating funds will need to come from somewhere else in the department. That likely means cuts in Football and Men's Basketball budgets.

There are also infrastructure upgrades required if we want to get back into the sport. Where does that money come from? We could discontinue the planned renovations to the AA and redirect the funds towards baseball/softball.

IMHO, we should focus on funding Football/Men's Basketball to the best of our ability rather than redirecting funds towards starting new programs. If those sports were consistently successful, they could generate additional revenue (Imagine the revenue difference between 10k per game and 6k per game in the AA) that might open up the possibility of athletic department expansion. I am not saying that is likely. Keep in mind our athletic department exists solely due to subsidies providing by the general university fund (and by extension the State of Wyoming, also students).

It comes from the tightwad State of Wyoming (or is supposed to) if they would get off their collective tightwad asses and fund this university the way other states (who have less money and more universities than we do) fund theirs. I'm sick and tired of hearing about the tight budgets in this state when we have one of the highest budget surplus's in the country.
 
Back
Top