Asmodeanreborn
Well-known member
laxwyo said:Speaks volumes that we were in it even with the turnovers.
The takeaways we had were pretty damn nice too.
laxwyo said:Speaks volumes that we were in it even with the turnovers.
I agree. Our lack of a rushing game doomed us. If we were able to get into 3rd and manageable instead of 3rd and long we would have won.laxwyo said:After rewatching the game, I have to say our defense played well. They gave up some big plays but stood tall many times. Our rushing game sucked bad. That's it. We establish at least a little rushing game and this is ours. The third down conversions was bad. Even with the terrible rushing attack, we had a chance. Speaks volumes that we were in it even with the turnovers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We obviously miss Granderson. Our D is beat up and more freshman started last night than juniors and seniors combined (4 vs 2). It is a young Dline that will only improve with more experience and weight gains.SDPokeFan said:To a point. But we have ZERO pass rush.LanderPoke said:Our OL got owned, but I disagree about our DL. Our DL played good and held their own.SDPokeFan said:Sitting here in the stands watching SDSU be awarded the trophy.
1. Second to last possession we need two yards in two plays, don't give the ball to Brian Hill once. He should go pro because clearly this coaching staff has zero faith in him.
Our offensive and defensive lines were dominated all game long.
That last possession was an absolute dumpster fire.
Exactly. This is a young team whose best years are ahead. SDSU is loaded with upperclassmen....Wyoming is not. With improved size, strength, and experience our lines will be dominate in a year.bladerunnr said:They had a good game plan on defense. They were going to make us beat them deep and for the most part, we didn't do it. From that standpoint, the cold hurt us more than them. I guess that's why most cold weather games are low scoring. After we got up 10-0, they really dominated the line of scrimmage for most of the game.
I thought the play calling was fine. It's easy to second guess plays that don't work. Josh probably had the pitch option on those 2 plays at the end. Our O-line made big strides this year but they struggled last night.
We need more short slant routes to make the defense pay for putting all those bodies up front.
joshvanklomp said:Most of the year, you could've easily made the argument that Josh Allen was the unit's best player.wyoair said:You can never make the argument for having your best player either on the sideline or not having the ball in his hands in a CRITICAL play. Inexcusable.
In the past, people have criticized Vigen for being too predictable by always giving the ball to Hill in those situations. Now he's criticized because he didn't give the ball to Hill. Those plays have caught teams off guard earlier in the season. It didn't tonight. Doesn't mean it was a wrong play call. The Aztecs just executed better. Sometimes, it's good to tip your cap to the opponent for making a better play.
They handled the cold weather better than us. That should have been an advantage. There were at least four muffed center exchanges with Allen which could have been the cold.bladerunnr said:They had a good game plan on defense. They were going to make us beat them deep and for the most part, we didn't do it. From that standpoint, the cold hurt us more than them. I guess that's why most cold weather games are low scoring. After we got up 10-0, they really dominated the line of scrimmage for most of the game.
I thought the play calling was fine. It's easy to second guess plays that don't work. Josh probably had the pitch option on those 2 plays at the end. Our O-line made big strides this year but they struggled last night.
We need more short slant routes to make the defense pay for putting all those bodies up front.
Why? Just because he used a pure vanilla offense like in the first two games? Because he played nice guy and didn't try any deception? Because he thought just running them over was the best method? Gee, you really are a meanie.Wyokie said:Vigen needs to be fired.
Adv8RU12 said:Why? Just because he used a pure vanilla offense like in the first two games? Because he played nice guy and didn't try any deception? Because he thought just running them over was the best method? Gee, you really are a meanie.Wyokie said:Vigen needs to be fired.
I think you missed my satire.Wyokie said:Adv8RU12 said:Why? Just because he used a pure vanilla offense like in the first two games? Because he played nice guy and didn't try any deception? Because he thought just running them over was the best method? Gee, you really are a meanie.Wyokie said:Vigen needs to be fired.
I want to win. By going vanilla you become predictable and lose! We need a killer mentality.
Adv8RU12 said:I think you missed my satire.Wyokie said:Adv8RU12 said:Why? Just because he used a pure vanilla offense like in the first two games? Because he played nice guy and didn't try any deception? Because he thought just running them over was the best method? Gee, you really are a meanie.Wyokie said:Vigen needs to be fired.
I want to win. By going vanilla you become predictable and lose! We need a killer mentality.