• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

For those doing cartwheels tonight...

Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.
Clearly, someone got into college on too many "A's for effort" and "social" promotions.
 
Wyovanian said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.
Clearly, someone got into college on too many "A's for effort" and "social" promotions.

:thumb:
Oh my God how did you figure it out? You know so much about me! :mrgreen:
 
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.

When I asked who the last coach to become bowl eligible 3 times in 5 years, I was actually asking, not just talking shit. Like you do,all the time.
But Tiller and Dimel did it, but that was what, 15 years ago?
My point is that we are 1 win away from hitting that milestone or benchmark.
Now if we lose, then fire DC.

It took more than a .500 record to make a bowl game back then.
 
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.

When I asked who the last coach to become bowl eligible 3 times in 5 years, I was actually asking, not just talking shit. Like you do,all the time.
But Tiller and Dimel did it, but that was what, 15 years ago?
My point is that we are 1 win away from hitting that milestone or benchmark.
Now if we lose, then fire DC.

It took more than a .500 record to make a bowl game back then.

Bowl eligible has always been 6 wins hasn't it? Glenn was bowl eligible twice, and DC twice so far.
I understand there are more bowls now, that's why I am wondering about eligibility aka 6 wins.
 
Cuttslam said:
So Beaver, 6-6 is a milestone/benchmark. You dumb bastard

Hey buddy, fuck you too.
Bowl eligibility and bowl games are a benchmark. If you didn't know that you are new to college football.
And you don't like it? You don't have to call me a dumb bastard you miserable fuck.
 
6-6 is a benchmark. Hahahahah thats fucking funny hahahah now I know where your low standards are. Lower than a snakes belly.
 
Cuttslam said:
6-6 is a benchmark. Hahahahah thats fucking funny hahahah now I know where your low standards are. Lower than a snakes belly.

Say haha some more. :thumb:

Serious question.... have you ever been happy in your life or is this misery only UW related? Either way, I'm glad I'm not you. Seems like it sucks.
 
Cuttslam said:
6-6 is a benchmark. Hahahahah thats fucking funny hahahah now I know where your low standards are. Lower than a snakes belly.
Average is the new excellent, don't'cha' know?
 
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
6-6 is a benchmark. Hahahahah thats fucking funny hahahah now I know where your low standards are. Lower than a snakes belly.

Say haha some more. :thumb:

Serious question.... have you ever been happy in your life or is this misery only UW related? Either way, I'm glad I'm not you. Seems like it sucks.
Good question Beaver, UW and misery go hand in hand. You'll get there sooner than later. Trust me, YOU would want to be me and it doesn't suck.
 
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.

When I asked who the last coach to become bowl eligible 3 times in 5 years, I was actually asking, not just talking shit. Like you do,all the time.
But Tiller and Dimel did it, but that was what, 15 years ago?
My point is that we are 1 win away from hitting that milestone or benchmark.
Now if we lose, then fire DC.

It took more than a .500 record to make a bowl game back then.

Bowl eligible has always been 6 wins hasn't it? Glenn was bowl eligible twice, and DC twice so far.
I understand there are more bowls now, that's why I am wondering about eligibility aka 6 wins.

You might want to do some research my friend.
 
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.

When I asked who the last coach to become bowl eligible 3 times in 5 years, I was actually asking, not just talking shit. Like you do,all the time.
But Tiller and Dimel did it, but that was what, 15 years ago?
My point is that we are 1 win away from hitting that milestone or benchmark.
Now if we lose, then fire DC.

It took more than a .500 record to make a bowl game back then.

Bowl eligible has always been 6 wins hasn't it? Glenn was bowl eligible twice, and DC twice so far.
I understand there are more bowls now, that's why I am wondering about eligibility aka 6 wins.

You might want to do some research my friend.

So you're saying you don't know?
 
I have arrived at the determination that based upon the responses of this BeaverPoke character (Drop the 'Beaver' part but quick, son), that this young man has mental issues that prevent him from being able to assess issues & items from a logical and reasonable point of view.

I advise many to approach with caution when/if responding to this pop-tart moving forward.

On another note - great wins for both the Nuggets and Avalanche tonight.
 
DocHolliday said:
I have arrived at the determination that based upon the responses of this BeaverPoke character (Drop the 'Beaver' part but quick, son), that this young man has mental issues that prevent him from being able to assess issues & items from a logical and reasonable point of view.

I advise many to approach with caution when/if responding to this pop-tart moving forward.

On another note - great wins for both the Nuggets and Avalanche tonight.


Hahaha good thing you have come to that conclusion! Or maybe just ask the people on her that know me.
Oh and btw, just because I say it, doesn't mean I'm the only one who feels this way about you, cuttslam, and wyonavian.
 
DocHolliday said:
I have arrived at the determination that based upon the responses of this BeaverPoke character (Drop the 'Beaver' part but quick, son), that this young man has mental issues that prevent him from being able to assess issues & items from a logical and reasonable point of view.

I advise many to approach with caution when/if responding to this pop-tart moving forward.

On another note - great wins for both the Nuggets and Avalanche tonight.
Yes I think a name change is in order. Pop-TartPoke has a nice ring to it.
 
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.

When I asked who the last coach to become bowl eligible 3 times in 5 years, I was actually asking, not just talking shit. Like you do,all the time.
But Tiller and Dimel did it, but that was what, 15 years ago?
My point is that we are 1 win away from hitting that milestone or benchmark.
Now if we lose, then fire DC.

It took more than a .500 record to make a bowl game back then.

Bowl eligible has always been 6 wins hasn't it? Glenn was bowl eligible twice, and DC twice so far.
I understand there are more bowls now, that's why I am wondering about eligibility aka 6 wins.

You might want to do some research my friend.

So you're saying you don't know?

I know, but I'm not going to do the work for you. You really are a piece of work, aren't you?
 
Cuttslam said:
DocHolliday said:
I have arrived at the determination that based upon the responses of this BeaverPoke character (Drop the 'Beaver' part but quick, son), that this young man has mental issues that prevent him from being able to assess issues & items from a logical and reasonable point of view.

I advise many to approach with caution when/if responding to this pop-tart moving forward.

On another note - great wins for both the Nuggets and Avalanche tonight.
Yes I think a name change is in order. Pop-TartPoke has a nice ring to it.
Gotta admit- I've never met anyone who was named for the process that put them here. I wonder how his Mom felt about that name.
 
BeaverPoke said:
DocHolliday said:
I have arrived at the determination that based upon the responses of this BeaverPoke character (Drop the 'Beaver' part but quick, son), that this young man has mental issues that prevent him from being able to assess issues & items from a logical and reasonable point of view.

I advise many to approach with caution when/if responding to this pop-tart moving forward.

On another note - great wins for both the Nuggets and Avalanche tonight.


Hahaha good thing you have come to that conclusion! Or maybe just ask the people on her that know me.
Oh and btw, just because I say it, doesn't mean I'm the only one who feels this way about you, cuttslam, and wyonavian.
Im pretty sure that Wyonavian, Doc and myself could careless what you or "other people" feel about us. whatever that means, Doc on the other hand is a little sensitive and has a hard time with criticism, but I'm sure he is working on it. :rofl:
 
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.

When I asked who the last coach to become bowl eligible 3 times in 5 years, I was actually asking, not just talking shit. Like you do,all the time.
But Tiller and Dimel did it, but that was what, 15 years ago?
My point is that we are 1 win away from hitting that milestone or benchmark.
Now if we lose, then fire DC.

It took more than a .500 record to make a bowl game back then.

Bowl eligible has always been 6 wins hasn't it? Glenn was bowl eligible twice, and DC twice so far.
I understand there are more bowls now, that's why I am wondering about eligibility aka 6 wins.

You might want to do some research my friend.

So you're saying you don't know?

I know, but I'm not going to do the work for you. You really are a piece of work, aren't you?

Well since 6-5 teams used to make it, I'm going to say yes 6 was the number.
 
WyoBrandX said:
Cuttslam said:
WyoBrandX said:
Cuttslam said:
Those SUNSHINE PUMPERS can make a shit sandwich taste like filet mignon

I'm not sure if your attacking me or agreeing with me. Personally, I hate filet mignon.
No attack just a statement

Well, I'm not sure where you stand. Since this is a message board, I'll let you know where I stand.

We beat Hawaii! Great! The last time we beat them I had just graduated high school.

We scored alot of points against them. Our Seniors got a win at home. Others got a few records. Thats great! They bust their ass and they deserve it. College football is a hard hitting game and it wears on your body quickly.

That said, we should have won all of our games starting with CSU. The fact that we lost to CSU has obviously resonated throughout the fan base. Many people forgot what losing to them felt like - and our head coach probably has never felt this kind of heat before.

We need a defense to keep us in the games. Thats not going to happen this year. HCDC just hasn't put the emphasis on this that he should have. Hell, he may regret that now.

What we need to do now is get through the last game of the season. I hope we win, but I think we lose by 21. I hope some big wigs at UW get involved and find us a solid, competant coaching team. A brutal defense. A fast scoring offense.

Thats where I stand. Enjoy the win. Its better than a terrible loss!
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.

When I asked who the last coach to become bowl eligible 3 times in 5 years, I was actually asking, not just talking shit. Like you do,all the time.
But Tiller and Dimel did it, but that was what, 15 years ago?
My point is that we are 1 win away from hitting that milestone or benchmark.
Now if we lose, then fire DC.

It took more than a .500 record to make a bowl game back then.

Bowl eligible has always been 6 wins hasn't it? Glenn was bowl eligible twice, and DC twice so far.
I understand there are more bowls now, that's why I am wondering about eligibility aka 6 wins.
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Subcanis said:
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
I love how the Beaver keeps brings up bowl eligibility. Well Dimel was eligible 3 times in 3 years I believe, and Tiller 3 times in 6 years. Its doesnt have the same significance as it did in the past, 6-6 ,7-6 teams in a bowl game is a joke but hey everybody gets a medal.

When I asked who the last coach to become bowl eligible 3 times in 5 years, I was actually asking, not just talking shit. Like you do,all the time.
But Tiller and Dimel did it, but that was what, 15 years ago?
My point is that we are 1 win away from hitting that milestone or benchmark.
Now if we lose, then fire DC.

It took more than a .500 record to make a bowl game back then.

Bowl eligible has always been 6 wins hasn't it? Glenn was bowl eligible twice, and DC twice so far.
I understand there are more bowls now, that's why I am wondering about eligibility aka 6 wins.

You might want to do some research my friend.

So you're saying you don't know?

I know, but I'm not going to do the work for you. You really are a piece of work, aren't you?

Well since 6-5 teams used to make it, I'm going to say yes 6 was the number.

Bowl eligible used to be much harder to attain. You ever read about the birth of the MWC?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top