Think Denver, Northern Colorado, CSU @Laramie. But don't think too hard yet.phxpoke said:Um...we have won 4 in a row.
bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
You do realize that while Edwards has only been here going on two years he has accomplished more with a better record than we've had in a long time right?bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
Wyo2dal said:You do realize that while Edwards has only been here going on two years he has accomplished more with a better record than we've had in a long time right?bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
CowboyNV said:Wyo2dal said:You do realize that while Edwards has only been here going on two years he has accomplished more with a better record than we've had in a long time right?bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
This - Wyo2dal is absolutely correct.
While there are times I scratch my head with the substitution patterns, he's got these kids believing that no matter how far down they are in a game, they still have a chance to compete and win. It is maddening to watch, but I love the spirit of this bunch. Give the guy a chance. His winning percentage is way better than Shyatt's (still early but trending the right way).
NowherePoke said:CowboyNV said:Wyo2dal said:You do realize that while Edwards has only been here going on two years he has accomplished more with a better record than we've had in a long time right?bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
This - Wyo2dal is absolutely correct.
While there are times I scratch my head with the substitution patterns, he's got these kids believing that no matter how far down they are in a game, they still have a chance to compete and win. It is maddening to watch, but I love the spirit of this bunch. Give the guy a chance. His winning percentage is way better than Shyatt's (still early but trending the right way).
The only comment I have here is that I believe your description sells Shyatt short. His winning percentage at UW was 60% (117-78) while Edwards is currently at 63%. However, Shyatt took over both times in very difficult situations. The first time taking over after Joby Wright. It was a mediocre team whose best player left at the coaching change (possibly addition by subtraction in all honestly, but still). The second time, he took over an absolute dumpster fire.
Beyond that, Edwards has simply been luckier than Shyatt in terms of injuries (or whatever you want to call the Martinez episode). I hope that continues.
I am not criticizing Edwards with this comparison, just standing up for Shyatt.
NowherePoke said:CowboyNV said:Wyo2dal said:You do realize that while Edwards has only been here going on two years he has accomplished more with a better record than we've had in a long time right?bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
This - Wyo2dal is absolutely correct.
While there are times I scratch my head with the substitution patterns, he's got these kids believing that no matter how far down they are in a game, they still have a chance to compete and win. It is maddening to watch, but I love the spirit of this bunch. Give the guy a chance. His winning percentage is way better than Shyatt's (still early but trending the right way).
The only comment I have here is that I believe your description sells Shyatt short. His winning percentage at UW was 60% (117-78) while Edwards is currently at 63%. However, Shyatt took over both times in very difficult situations. The first time taking over after Joby Wright. It was a mediocre team whose best player left at the coaching change (possibly addition by subtraction in all honestly, but still). The second time, he took over an absolute dumpster fire.
Beyond that, Edwards has simply been luckier than Shyatt in terms of injuries (or whatever you want to call the Martinez episode). I hope that continues.
I am not criticizing Edwards with this comparison, just standing up for Shyatt.
bladerunnr said:NowherePoke said:CowboyNV said:Wyo2dal said:You do realize that while Edwards has only been here going on two years he has accomplished more with a better record than we've had in a long time right?bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
This - Wyo2dal is absolutely correct.
While there are times I scratch my head with the substitution patterns, he's got these kids believing that no matter how far down they are in a game, they still have a chance to compete and win. It is maddening to watch, but I love the spirit of this bunch. Give the guy a chance. His winning percentage is way better than Shyatt's (still early but trending the right way).
The only comment I have here is that I believe your description sells Shyatt short. His winning percentage at UW was 60% (117-78) while Edwards is currently at 63%. However, Shyatt took over both times in very difficult situations. The first time taking over after Joby Wright. It was a mediocre team whose best player left at the coaching change (possibly addition by subtraction in all honestly, but still). The second time, he took over an absolute dumpster fire.
Beyond that, Edwards has simply been luckier than Shyatt in terms of injuries (or whatever you want to call the Martinez episode). I hope that continues.
I am not criticizing Edwards with this comparison, just standing up for Shyatt.
Naughton's injury has affected this team. He is a low post presence that we just don't have without him. I don't know how it's going to end up, but Edwards is John Wooden compared to Schroyer. I'm more than a little concerned about what next year is going to look like with our best 2 players graduating. So the jury is out regarding recruiting.
There's no doubt Shyatt was great for Wyoming. I never felt like we got outcoached when he was here. But I think Edwards is starting to make better in game adjustments. I like that he extended the defense at the end of the game last night and went with Gorski and Redding, whose 3's in the last minute got us to overtime. I thought the team could have really gone south after the home loss to csewe. We haven't lost since and Edwards has to get some credit for that.
TSpoke said:bladerunnr said:NowherePoke said:CowboyNV said:Wyo2dal said:You do realize that while Edwards has only been here going on two years he has accomplished more with a better record than we've had in a long time right?bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
This - Wyo2dal is absolutely correct.
While there are times I scratch my head with the substitution patterns, he's got these kids believing that no matter how far down they are in a game, they still have a chance to compete and win. It is maddening to watch, but I love the spirit of this bunch. Give the guy a chance. His winning percentage is way better than Shyatt's (still early but trending the right way).
The only comment I have here is that I believe your description sells Shyatt short. His winning percentage at UW was 60% (117-78) while Edwards is currently at 63%. However, Shyatt took over both times in very difficult situations. The first time taking over after Joby Wright. It was a mediocre team whose best player left at the coaching change (possibly addition by subtraction in all honestly, but still). The second time, he took over an absolute dumpster fire.
Beyond that, Edwards has simply been luckier than Shyatt in terms of injuries (or whatever you want to call the Martinez episode). I hope that continues.
I am not criticizing Edwards with this comparison, just standing up for Shyatt.
Naughton's injury has affected this team. He is a low post presence that we just don't have without him. I don't know how it's going to end up, but Edwards is John Wooden compared to Schroyer. I'm more than a little concerned about what next year is going to look like with our best 2 players graduating. So the jury is out regarding recruiting.
There's no doubt Shyatt was great for Wyoming. I never felt like we got outcoached when he was here. But I think Edwards is starting to make better in game adjustments. I like that he extended the defense at the end of the game last night and went with Gorski and Redding, whose 3's in the last minute got us to overtime. I thought the team could have really gone south after the home loss to csewe. We haven't lost since and Edwards has to get some credit for that.
I agree with your post but just pointing out that we don't lose our best 2 players. We lose our 2nd and 3rd best players. JJ will be around another year.
Its incredibly silly to be saying fire Edwards during the middle of a current 4 game win streak. HE is a young coach and hasn't made all the right calls (in my very limited opinion) but has made some great adjustments at times(including playing Gorski and Redding last night).
Its still early in his career and he has a ways to grow but I believe his ceiling is higher than Shyatts. I may get burned and have to backtrack but I am fully on board with Edwards right now.
bladerunnr said:NowherePoke said:CowboyNV said:Wyo2dal said:You do realize that while Edwards has only been here going on two years he has accomplished more with a better record than we've had in a long time right?bullpoke said:Ok this experiment just didn't work.. its time for him to go.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
This - Wyo2dal is absolutely correct.
While there are times I scratch my head with the substitution patterns, he's got these kids believing that no matter how far down they are in a game, they still have a chance to compete and win. It is maddening to watch, but I love the spirit of this bunch. Give the guy a chance. His winning percentage is way better than Shyatt's (still early but trending the right way).
The only comment I have here is that I believe your description sells Shyatt short. His winning percentage at UW was 60% (117-78) while Edwards is currently at 63%. However, Shyatt took over both times in very difficult situations. The first time taking over after Joby Wright. It was a mediocre team whose best player left at the coaching change (possibly addition by subtraction in all honestly, but still). The second time, he took over an absolute dumpster fire.
Beyond that, Edwards has simply been luckier than Shyatt in terms of injuries (or whatever you want to call the Martinez episode). I hope that continues.
I am not criticizing Edwards with this comparison, just standing up for Shyatt.
Naughton's injury has affected this team. He is a low post presence that we just don't have without him. I don't know how it's going to end up, but Edwards is John Wooden compared to Schroyer. I'm more than a little concerned about what next year is going to look like with our best 2 players graduating. So the jury is out regarding recruiting.
There's no doubt Shyatt was great for Wyoming. I never felt like we got outcoached when he was here. But I think Edwards is starting to make better in game adjustments. I like that he extended the defense at the end of the game last night and went with Gorski and Redding, whose 3's in the last minute got us to overtime. I thought the team could have really gone south after the home loss to csewe. We haven't lost since and Edwards has to get some credit for that.
ItSucksToBeACSURam said:That being said, its equally absurd to make Shyatt the measuring stick against which all future coaches will be measured. Shyatt was average at best, and had it not been for an incredible stretch of games and a Cinderella 2 weeks, he would have been deemed a bust. He was no guru, no genius, and certainly not infallible. Where Edwards schemes falter because were soft on the Defensive side of the ball, Shyatts team faltered because they were ONLY strong on the defensive side of the ball. IT was so aggravating seeing our defensive teams under Shyatt hold teams to season low point totals and still lose. At times it didn't matter if we held teams to 60 because we couldn't consistently score 61.
LanderPoke said:ItSucksToBeACSURam said:That being said, its equally absurd to make Shyatt the measuring stick against which all future coaches will be measured. Shyatt was average at best, and had it not been for an incredible stretch of games and a Cinderella 2 weeks, he would have been deemed a bust. He was no guru, no genius, and certainly not infallible. Where Edwards schemes falter because were soft on the Defensive side of the ball, Shyatts team faltered because they were ONLY strong on the defensive side of the ball. IT was so aggravating seeing our defensive teams under Shyatt hold teams to season low point totals and still lose. At times it didn't matter if we held teams to 60 because we couldn't consistently score 61.
The no O rebounding thing is so incredibly stupid to me. How could Shyatt justify not hitting the boards when we had Larry Nance Jr and Derek Cooke Jr and Josh Adams on the same team. We could have OWNED teams by rebounding them to death. We could have had 10+ more possessions than our opponents, but no, Shyatt thought it would be more beneficial to get back on defense?? This isn't the NBA
LanderPoke said:ItSucksToBeACSURam said:That being said, its equally absurd to make Shyatt the measuring stick against which all future coaches will be measured. Shyatt was average at best, and had it not been for an incredible stretch of games and a Cinderella 2 weeks, he would have been deemed a bust. He was no guru, no genius, and certainly not infallible. Where Edwards schemes falter because were soft on the Defensive side of the ball, Shyatts team faltered because they were ONLY strong on the defensive side of the ball. IT was so aggravating seeing our defensive teams under Shyatt hold teams to season low point totals and still lose. At times it didn't matter if we held teams to 60 because we couldn't consistently score 61.
The no O rebounding thing is so incredibly stupid to me. How could Shyatt justify not hitting the boards when we had Larry Nance Jr and Derek Cooke Jr and Josh Adams on the same team. We could have OWNED teams by rebounding them to death. We could have had 10+ more possessions than our opponents, but no, Shyatt thought it would be more beneficial to get back on defense?? This isn't the NBA