DocHolliday
Well-known member
WYOMING: 40
Nevada: 37
Just a hunch, not really sure why I feel the Pokes will pull off a stunner....
Nevada: 37
Just a hunch, not really sure why I feel the Pokes will pull off a stunner....
Watch out j-rod here comes beaverpoke in 3-2-1J-Rod said:Is called being a fan. It wears off sometime during the 2nd quarter.
Cuttslam said:Watch out j-rod here comes beaverpoke in 3-2-1J-Rod said:Is called being a fan. It wears off sometime during the 2nd quarter.
Nevermind that the 'Pokes have one of the best passing games in the country and UNR is nearly dead last in pass defense. First time this season they've faced a true dual-threat QB too. This one looks a bit more like the '88 AFA game to me than last year's USU game. The Aggies had a good defense last year that's become a great one this year.Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
It's only a shootout if our o-line steps up and becomes, if nothing else, average.Wyovanian said:Nevermind that the 'Pokes have one of the best passing games in the country and UNR is nearly dead last in pass defense. First time this season they've faced a true dual-threat QB too. This one looks a bit more like the '88 AFA game to me than last year's USU game. The Aggies had a good defense last year that's become a great one this year.Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
Nevada's D isn't exactly the poster child for penetration....fromolwyoming said:It's only a shootout if our o-line steps up and becomes, if nothing else, average.Wyovanian said:Nevermind that the 'Pokes have one of the best passing games in the country and UNR is nearly dead last in pass defense. First time this season they've faced a true dual-threat QB too. This one looks a bit more like the '88 AFA game to me than last year's USU game. The Aggies had a good defense last year that's become a great one this year.Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
:|seattlecowboy said:Toledo is a far better team than Nevada is.
One word: Idaho.Wyovanian said:Nevada's D isn't exactly the poster child for penetration....fromolwyoming said:It's only a shootout if our o-line steps up and becomes, if nothing else, average.Wyovanian said:Nevermind that the 'Pokes have one of the best passing games in the country and UNR is nearly dead last in pass defense. First time this season they've faced a true dual-threat QB too. This one looks a bit more like the '88 AFA game to me than last year's USU game. The Aggies had a good defense last year that's become a great one this year.Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
Meh. It wasn't Idaho's defense that made us look bad, it was our defense that made us look bad.fromolwyoming said:One word: Idaho.Wyovanian said:Nevada's D isn't exactly the poster child for penetration....fromolwyoming said:It's only a shootout if our o-line steps up and becomes, if nothing else, average.Wyovanian said:Nevermind that the 'Pokes have one of the best passing games in the country and UNR is nearly dead last in pass defense. First time this season they've faced a true dual-threat QB too. This one looks a bit more like the '88 AFA game to me than last year's USU game. The Aggies had a good defense last year that's become a great one this year.Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
Define "look bad". Some would say the pressure they got on Smitty is embarrassing. Idaho doesn't put defensive pressure on ANYBODY. Brett took many big shots and had to create his own plays often. While the defense surely deserves the brunt of the criticism, the offensive line deserves some too. Smith is a great QB, and nobody on that line is doing him any favors.Wyovanian said:Meh. It wasn't Idaho's defense that made us look bad, it was our defense that made us look bad.
And, up until Idaho, the line had been doing a pretty solid job against bigger, faster teams. At some point, in a one-sided program, fatigue sets in. We saw it under Glenn when the defense became demoralized by the inability of the offense to produce. They lost their motivation and looked fatigued. Against Idaho, it was flipped- the defense couldn't stop Idaho on third-and-Pocatello. Every possession we were playing catch-up, and it was all on the offense. I'd argue that if the defense had stopped two Idaho drives, our offense would have scored three more times.J-Rod said:Define "look bad". Some would say the pressure they got on Smitty is embarrassing. Idaho doesn't put defensive pressure on ANYBODY. Brett took many big shots and had to create his own plays often. While the defense surely deserves the brunt of the criticism, the offensive line deserves some too. Smith is a great QB, and nobody on that line is doing him any favors.Wyovanian said:Meh. It wasn't Idaho's defense that made us look bad, it was our defense that made us look bad.
Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
so you're saying that nevada just played the only 5 teams with worse rushing defenses than ours?JimmyDimes said:Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
They are a solid running team, but how good is the level of competition they've faced? Not ready to give the game to Nevada just yet.
Go Pokes!!
Hawaii, yes.wyosteelerfan said:so you're saying that nevada just played the only 5 teams with worse rushing defenses than ours?JimmyDimes said:Adv8RU12 said:All the posters above are ignoring the fact that Nevada is one of the best rushing teams in the country and the Pokes one of the worst at defensing such. So Nevada offence will be on the field a long time compared to the Poke's. That means less scoring time for the Pokes UNLESS there are some lucky long bombs. That situation doesn't happen all that often.
They are a solid running team, but how good is the level of competition they've faced? Not ready to give the game to Nevada just yet.
Go Pokes!!