DocHolliday
Well-known member
The season-ending swoons have unfortunately been a hallmark of Larry Shyatt coached teams the last few seasons.
The collective win total over the past 3 years is somewhat artificially inflated by winning against mediocre to sub-mediocre teams over the last 3 seasons...the overall won-lost record is not as impressive as it may appear on the surface.
I think that full disclosure would reveal that everyone who visits this great forum for UW sports wants nothing but the best for the Pokes & each and every one of us bleeds brown & gold with passion & enthusiasm.
I think that our football program is in excellent hands and the confidence that I feel for the success that is to come with Coach Bohl and his staff is legit.
But where do we stand on the basketball front?
I love Coach Shyatt as a man and I believe he's done well more good than bad since he came back a few years ago. That said people are obviously frustrated and perhaps with good reason on several issues.
Is it unfair to give him and his staff a complete grade at this point -- or is the right thing to give him more time before rendering a final assessment on his impact on UW hoops?
It may be hard to judge too harshly with the number of wins Shyatt's teams have accumulated -- but then again on the other hand his clubs have no doubt underachieved with consistency when they have needed to rise to the occasion and deliver a statement game win.
Bottom line question for you: Is Larry Shyatt the coach who can lead this program to bigger and better things and deliver sustained success for Wyoming basketball? Or is he the coach who can bring about a certain level of respectability to the program - but nothing beyond that?
P.S. This message and inquiry has nothing to do really with tonight's UNLV loss - this is a question that's been wandering around my mind pretty much all season. I think this year's team is right around where they should be. They can defend well at times, but they lack the ability to shoot with consistency, they play very sloppy with the basketball, and they are inconsistent from the FT line. They have little depth and are seemingly a one-dimensional club. In a strong year for the MWC they would have dropped out of the conversation weeks ago. They are an average basketball team - and have been the entire season, Larry Nance Jr, or not.
The collective win total over the past 3 years is somewhat artificially inflated by winning against mediocre to sub-mediocre teams over the last 3 seasons...the overall won-lost record is not as impressive as it may appear on the surface.
I think that full disclosure would reveal that everyone who visits this great forum for UW sports wants nothing but the best for the Pokes & each and every one of us bleeds brown & gold with passion & enthusiasm.
I think that our football program is in excellent hands and the confidence that I feel for the success that is to come with Coach Bohl and his staff is legit.
But where do we stand on the basketball front?
I love Coach Shyatt as a man and I believe he's done well more good than bad since he came back a few years ago. That said people are obviously frustrated and perhaps with good reason on several issues.
Is it unfair to give him and his staff a complete grade at this point -- or is the right thing to give him more time before rendering a final assessment on his impact on UW hoops?
It may be hard to judge too harshly with the number of wins Shyatt's teams have accumulated -- but then again on the other hand his clubs have no doubt underachieved with consistency when they have needed to rise to the occasion and deliver a statement game win.
Bottom line question for you: Is Larry Shyatt the coach who can lead this program to bigger and better things and deliver sustained success for Wyoming basketball? Or is he the coach who can bring about a certain level of respectability to the program - but nothing beyond that?
P.S. This message and inquiry has nothing to do really with tonight's UNLV loss - this is a question that's been wandering around my mind pretty much all season. I think this year's team is right around where they should be. They can defend well at times, but they lack the ability to shoot with consistency, they play very sloppy with the basketball, and they are inconsistent from the FT line. They have little depth and are seemingly a one-dimensional club. In a strong year for the MWC they would have dropped out of the conversation weeks ago. They are an average basketball team - and have been the entire season, Larry Nance Jr, or not.