BeaverPoke said:
Lol really?
Me: IDK if Bohl showing up late contributed to Thompson leaving.
Potato: THAT'S HORSESHIT SAYING THAT'S THE REASON THOMSPON LEFT.
Me: I didn't say that, I said I don't know if it contributed or not.
Potato: THAT'S HORSESHIT I QUOTED YOU AND YOU LIED.
Dude, if you quoted me saying that Bohl's late arrival caused Thompson to leave, show me, please.
But if you go and find that all I said was "I don't know if it contributed to it" then re-read it and realize I didn't say he caused him to leave.
FFS man, chill out and get off your damn high horse and read what I said.
You CAN'T even quote properly....You quoted me as saying... (btw, doing a quote in all caps is really stupid.)
"Potato: THAT'S HORSESHIT SAYING THAT'S THE REASON THOMPSON LEFT."
I actually said, "Jason Thompson is a LIAR pure and simple and he lied to you straight to your face and you try and say that Bohl keeping his word and seeing the NDSU season out might had something to do with Thompson leaving, what horsesh&t.....the QB coach at UW was trying to get a job at Utah at the time and he talked to Thompson and guess what, Thompson transfers, did Thompson tell you this?" You on purpose left out the word "might", which of course means that I accurately relayed what you said. Just proof that you do not quote accurately or correctly, and the only reason is that you wish to twist what others say. Leaving out the word "might" changes the who context of the sentence, but of course you knew that and that is why you left it out.
The second part. you said, "Me: I didn't say that, I said that I didn't know if it contributed or not."
"Potato: THAT'S HORSESHIT I QUOTED YOU AND YOU LIED." You did lie because you didn't quote me correctly. You left out the word "might" from my quote, and leaving it out you twisted what I said.
You brought up this whole subject, which you did, or are you going to try and deny that. Your statements intimated that Thompson's leaving might have something to do with Bohl not coming to UW immediately and that would possibly cost Wyoming a bowl game or two. Did you or did you not say this? If you want I can go back and give the exact quote...you probably wouldn't like that because it would show that you did bring it up and intimate that Bohl not coming immediately caused issues. You ignored the fact that Thompson lied to Bohl and you ignored the fact that there was a dead period for much of the time that Bohl was still taking care of business in North Dakota and it wouldn't have made any difference if he had been in Laramie or not. You also ignored the fact of all of the work that Bohl did for Wyoming while still up in North Dakota. You also ignored the fact that Bohl made a special trip to see Thompson and Smith in the PNW. My point was that you was that this whole suggestion that it was the possible reason that Thompson didn't stay and how cost Wyoming was horseshit, and it still is. I knew that you would come back and not be intellectually honest about quoting me, and I proved it by pointing out how you ignored a very important word when you so-called quoted me. Your intellectual honesty is in even more doubt after this last post than it was before. If you wish to come back and address this again, at least this time, quote me correctly for once, how about it?
opcorn:
