Not trying to be a jerk but really wondering, what do you mean by that? I think Bohl is a good coach and can get the job done here but I haven't really seen anything different as far as going all-in than any other coach we've had. Just curious.
No, it's cool.
From what I understand, Bohl took this job with these expressed aims/goals/procedures...whatever you want to call them (in no particular order, at all): institute a new regimen of physical conditioning and nutrition; recruit young men who will commit to that and the style of football that flows from that (no spread offense, etc.); recruit young men likely to commit to 4-5 years of eligibility (no JCs); recruit young men who will also maintain their eligibility through proper off-field behavior and attention to the classroom; making sure that everyone understood that there would be a commitment to all of that from the water boys on up; making sure everyone understood that all meant that there would be real attrition from the holdovers and that recruiting over the first few years would tell the tale.
In short, and I'm sure I missed or didn't fully state some things -- and in the context of this being a last coaching job -- he came with an aim of rebuilding a
program, not merely a team.
And, look, I sure don't know that this is going to work. But it's a vision we've been lacking for the last -- what? -- like 20 years?
So, I'm prepared to buckle my seatbelt and ride it out.