LanderPoke
Well-known member
He said this today. Hopefully it translates to some wins
Wyokie said:That's just coachspeak. They ALL say that!!!!!
I'll believe it when I see it.
OrediggerPoke said:Wyokie said:That's just coachspeak. They ALL say that!!!!!
I'll believe it when I see it.
I don’t know all of Bohl’s teams at other schools. Since I have been following Wyoming, there has never been a deeper and more experienced team. That is why I optimistically predicted 10 wins.
Or you can also look at the roster and depth chart and see the game experience of the players at the various positions to draw your own conclusions.Wyokie said:OrediggerPoke said:Wyokie said:That's just coachspeak. They ALL say that!!!!!
I'll believe it when I see it.
I don’t know all of Bohl’s teams at other schools. Since I have been following Wyoming, there has never been a deeper and more experienced team. That is why I optimistically predicted 10 wins.
All head coaches say the usual "this is the deepest one yet" or whatever to the media. Basic coachspeak. My theory...to get more people to buy season tickets.
Until we actually get 10 wins or more and/or an outright conference championship for the first time since 1988, I aint holding my breath. As I said before...I'll believe when I see it!
bullbugle307 said:We automatically assume that number of years in our system automatically translates into quality of player. That's not always the case. I don't really believe our O line is just going to dominate JUST because of experience when they weren't able to do it in the past with the same players and when people were saying all the same things about them. Maybe Polasek changes that, but I'm starting to get worried that we're not really gonna change much on offense and Bohls gonna make Polasek run Vigen 2.0, or maybe it really has been Bohl ball all along.
Until it happens, it's all just people yapping. Obviously I want to be proven wrong, but I've heard enough over the years and seen enough overly optimistic poke fans year in and year out, you can't help but be suspicious.
bullbugle307 said:We automatically assume that number of years in our system automatically translates into quality of player. That's not always the case. I don't really believe our O line is just going to dominate JUST because of experience when they weren't able to do it in the past with the same players and when people were saying all the same things about them. Maybe Polasek changes that, but I'm starting to get worried that we're not really gonna change much on offense and Bohls gonna make Polasek run Vigen 2.0, or maybe it really has been Bohl ball all along.
Until it happens, it's all just people yapping. Obviously I want to be proven wrong, but I've heard enough over the years and seen enough overly optimistic poke fans year in and year out, you can't help but be suspicious.
bullbugle307 said:We automatically assume that number of years in our system automatically translates into quality of player. That's not always the case. I don't really believe our O line is just going to dominate JUST because of experience when they weren't able to do it in the past with the same players and when people were saying all the same things about them. Maybe Polasek changes that, but I'm starting to get worried that we're not really gonna change much on offense and Bohls gonna make Polasek run Vigen 2.0, or maybe it really has been Bohl ball all along.
Until it happens, it's all just people yapping. Obviously I want to be proven wrong, but I've heard enough over the years and seen enough overly optimistic poke fans year in and year out, you can't help but be suspicious.
phxpoke said:bullbugle307 said:We automatically assume that number of years in our system automatically translates into quality of player. That's not always the case. I don't really believe our O line is just going to dominate JUST because of experience when they weren't able to do it in the past with the same players and when people were saying all the same things about them. Maybe Polasek changes that, but I'm starting to get worried that we're not really gonna change much on offense and Bohls gonna make Polasek run Vigen 2.0, or maybe it really has been Bohl ball all along.
Until it happens, it's all just people yapping. Obviously I want to be proven wrong, but I've heard enough over the years and seen enough overly optimistic poke fans year in and year out, you can't help but be suspicious.Agree. Put up or shut up.
ragtimejoe1 said:Article about most stable program (also discussed below) https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/31871083/college-football-2021-stability-rankings-rating-all-130-fbs-teams-coaches-roster-performance
One metric is roster stability which measures returning productivity. Though in the paragraph they incorrectly state Wisconsin instead of Wyoming is at the top of this metric, it does indicate that relative to other programs, Bohl does have more returning players that contributed in previous years than other programs. Granted I have no idea how they calculated that, but I'm too damn lazy to go run through any sort of similar analysis for even the MWC let alone all of CFB. Thus, I'm taking their word for it :lol:
Old-Bull said:I think that article about program stability was written by someone that did exactly one year of research, during a season effected by covid. They obviously missed us having to replace key defensive coaches every few seasons for the entire Bohl tenure. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing: it means Bohl is good at hiring defensive coaches. I just don't think we have as much stability as people imply.
I do think we're incredibly deep. Yes, everyone is deep this year because everyone got an extra year of eligibility. There are levels to that and I think Wyoming is at the top of that level. Not everyone decided to use their extra year of eligibility. Some left for the draft. Some just moved on. Not everyone came back. Everyone on our team came back. We weren't going to lose a lot last season even without Covid, so we would have been pretty deep in comparison anyway.
As far as the offensive line is concerned, they were disappointing last year. Some of that was performance. Some of that was having a bunch of unexpected losses right before the season started. Patrick Arnold leaving, another injury to Velazquez.....etc. Even though they had depth, they still lost 3 or 4 guys out of the rotation. I guess depth should have minimized that effect and it didn't, but I'm not ready to say the offensive line isn't talented, especially with the circumstances last season.
We'll see though. The pressure is on for Bohl. Anything less than 9 wins is going to be considered failure. If Polasek struggles and they can't make significant improvements in the passing game it's going to point the finger squarely at Bohl. If Polasek isn't any better at developing our qb's than Vigen was maybe that shows that we haven't been good at identifying qb talent.
This will be an interesting season for Wyoming. If Bohl's seat isn't hot yet it's because of the increase in attendance he's managed to orchestrate, but that's only going to last so long. His seat might not be hot yet but he's sitting on a huge pile of firewood soaked in gasoline and people have their matches in hand.