OrediggerPoke
Well-known member
laxwyo said:I was actually going to bring him up and how i thought he should be targeted instead of Conway. I too thought it is weird we haven’t seen him after his TD in the WSU game
He left the team Sep. 10.
laxwyo said:I was actually going to bring him up and how i thought he should be targeted instead of Conway. I too thought it is weird we haven’t seen him after his TD in the WSU game
Football Fan 22 said:Oreodifferpoke, Yes I am a family member, tell me how can Avante contribute to the team by sitting on the bench every game. For everyone that has an opinion tell me why was Avante listed as the starter on the depth chart but doesn't start or get targeted. I usually don't post on social media because people only pick apart sections of your comments instead of addressing the whole statement. I tried to get my son to stay at WYO but you bring in a kid from a JUCO and target him more than Price, Conway and all the receivers from last year. Address why Ismail has more dropped passes than anyone on the team. Avante did work hard he was the starter!!!!!!
Football Fan 22 said:Oreodifferpoke, Yes I am a family member, tell me how can Avante contribute to the team by sitting on the bench every game. For everyone that has an opinion tell me why was Avante listed as the starter on the depth chart but doesn't start or get targeted. I usually don't post on social media because people only pick apart sections of your comments instead of addressing the whole statement. I tried to get my son to stay at WYO but you bring in a kid from a JUCO and target him more than Price, Conway and all the receivers from last year. Address why Ismail has more dropped passes than anyone on the team. Avante did work hard he was the starter!!!!!!
'PokeForLife said:DVDA said:BackHarlowRoad said:Reviving a month old thread? Two users with 4 total posts, all discussing Avante Cox and how he was wronged?
Couldn't be a family member...
Even so, they have a point. The kid got the short end of the stick.
Same here. I think he was better than the extent he was being utilized. That said, quitting is just not palatable to me. Stick it out. There are a lot of people who have been wronged in more ways than one.
'PokeForLife said:Saving a year of eligibility is another layer of depth to the situation that nobody here knew.
Wyoklaelk said:kinda like playing woods instead of overstreet.....
this offensive staff is just plain stupid sometimes
BackHarlowRoad speaks a lot of truth.Asmodeanreborn said:Wyoklaelk said:kinda like playing woods instead of overstreet.....
this offensive staff is just plain stupid sometimes
If there's something to the argument of politics... who recruited Woods and who recruited Overstreet, and is either still on staff?
OrediggerPoke said:BackHarlowRoad speaks a lot of truth.Asmodeanreborn said:Wyoklaelk said:kinda like playing woods instead of overstreet.....
this offensive staff is just plain stupid sometimes
If there's something to the argument of politics... who recruited Woods and who recruited Overstreet, and is either still on staff?
That said, Woods was recruited as a LB/ATH and made the switch to RB late in fall camp last year.
OrediggerPoke said:'PokeForLife said:Saving a year of eligibility is another layer of depth to the situation that nobody here knew.
I knew. Didn’t and doesn’t change my opinion one bit about quitting mid season. Quitting mid season is not in my belief system period.
But actually I don’t believe it saves a year of eligibility if transferring to an FBS because he is not a grad and still must sit out next year if transferring to an FBS because he appeared in a game this year for Wyoming. The move only saves a year of eligibility for an underclassman (non graduating) under the new 4 game rule if transferring from FBS to FCS or D2. Worth pointing out that he left after the 2nd game and not the 4th game (not that it changes leaving mid season).
WestWYOPoke said:OrediggerPoke said:'PokeForLife said:Saving a year of eligibility is another layer of depth to the situation that nobody here knew.
I knew. Didn’t and doesn’t change my opinion one bit about quitting mid season. Quitting mid season is not in my belief system period.
But actually I don’t believe it saves a year of eligibility if transferring to an FBS because he is not a grad and still must sit out next year if transferring to an FBS because he appeared in a game this year for Wyoming. The move only saves a year of eligibility for an underclassman (non graduating) under the new 4 game rule if transferring from FBS to FCS or D2. Worth pointing out that he left after the 2nd game and not the 4th game (not that it changes leaving mid season).
Not exactly true.
With the new rules, he can transfer and play right away because - despite playing this year - it is still counted as a redshirt year since he played in 4 games or less. Basically, it's the same situation as a guy that plays in zero games and transfers to another school, he won't have to sit a year.
OrediggerPoke said:I don't believe that you are correct at all. Everything I have previously read or heard from reputable sources from when the rule was proposed, passed and until now still keeps the one year 'sit-out' rule in place for an FBS transfer. The redshirt rule basically just ensures that all football athletes get 5 years so long as they play in 4 games or less in at least one of their 5 years.
The USA Today certainly disagrees with your view.
"The transfer rule also doesn’t go far enough: The council should next create a rule allowing qualified student-athletes – those who reach a certain GPA or a more standardized academic benchmark – to transfer without a one-year penalty, as in the case with the existing rule regarding graduate transfers."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2018/06/13/ncaa-transfer-redshirt-rule-major-impact-college-football/698734002/
A new rule allows players to play in four games without burning a redshirt season, allowing McCleskey to be eligible to play in 2019 without being required to graduate.
McCleskey’s departure is part of a new phenomenon of players utilizing the new redshirt rule to their advantage. By leaving when he is, McCleskey will not have this season count against his eligibility, thus allowing him to play elsewhere in 2019.