LanderPoke
Well-known member
I hate how my hometown is dragged into all of this. It's not us who killed him. Geez.
I’m with you Lander. There is a lot more to the story that is forgotten or conveniently overlooked. Those aspects don’t fit the narrative being pushed.LanderPoke said:I hate how my hometown is dragged into all of this. It's not us who killed him. Geez.
Totally narative-driven.ZapPoke said:I’m with you Lander. There is a lot more to the story that is forgotten or conveniently overlooked. Those aspects don’t fit the narrative being pushed.LanderPoke said:I hate how my hometown is dragged into all of this. It's not us who killed him. Geez.
LanderPoke said:I hate how my hometown is dragged into all of this. It's not us who killed him. Geez.
It makes me mad bat because Laramie is about the most tolerant place on earth and we get branded as bigotsfromolwyoming said:Lander, it happened here. I was here too for it. Facts are;
A brutal murder happened here in Laramie.
The only one that ever said anything on the killers being bisexual has never been confirmed by anyone else, even the killers themselves.
While it does suck that our town had such a thing happen, it is best to remember it so it never happens again.
And while it may not seem like much to you, the simple acknowledgement of this, of it being so wrong and remembered, can actually give some hope to those struggling with their own sexuality. That they won't have to be afraid for simply living in a place like Laramie.
Trying to bury it though, is not going to make things better. Just worse.LanderPoke said:It makes me mad bat because Laramie is about the most tolerant place on earth and we get branded as bigotsfromolwyoming said:Lander, it happened here. I was here too for it. Facts are;
A brutal murder happened here in Laramie.
The only one that ever said anything on the killers being bisexual has never been confirmed by anyone else, even the killers themselves.
While it does suck that our town had such a thing happen, it is best to remember it so it never happens again.
And while it may not seem like much to you, the simple acknowledgement of this, of it being so wrong and remembered, can actually give some hope to those struggling with their own sexuality. That they won't have to be afraid for simply living in a place like Laramie.
http://kowb1290.com/matthew-shepards-murder-still-haunts-wyoming-20-years-later/Asmodeanreborn said:Wait, who's branding Wyoming people bigots for the whole Shepard deal? Anytime I see it covered, a big deal is made about how Wyoming is unfriendly to the Westboro Baptists and how Wyoming as a whole is a "live and let live" state.
fromolwyoming said:Lander, it happened here. I was here too for it. Facts are;
A brutal murder happened here in Laramie.
The only one that ever said anything on the killers being bisexual has never been confirmed by anyone else, even the killers themselves.
While it does suck that our town had such a thing happen, it is best to remember it so it never happens again.
And while it may not seem like much to you, the simple acknowledgement of this, of it being so wrong and remembered, can actually give some hope to those struggling with their own sexuality. That they won't have to be afraid for simply living in a place like Laramie.
CasparMilquetoast said:Wrong. HIs killers were gay as well, in fact, one of them, Aaron McKinney, engaged in homosexual acts with Shepard many times.
CasparMilquetoast said:Read The Book Of Matt, it was not and never was a crime motivated by a hatred of homosexuals, although, the media loves to spin it as such. Matt Shepard wasn't killed becuase he was light in the loafers.
Police officials interviewed after Jimenez's book's publication disputed certain claims made in the book. Dave O'Malley, the Laramie police commander over the investigations division at the time of Shepard's murder, said Jimenez's claim that Shepard was "a methamphetamine kingpin is almost humorous. Someone that would buy into that certainly would believe almost anything they read." Rob Debree, lead sheriff's investigator at the time, said the book contains "factual errors and lies", and deemed Jimenez's claim that Shepard was a drug dealer "truly laughable".
Haha, what? You can disagree with the position of the book but its certainly not random junk. The book poses a viable and plausible explanation of why he was murdered. Why do you say its fiction and junk?Asmodeanreborn said:CasparMilquetoast said:Read The Book Of Matt, it was not and never was a crime motivated by a hatred of homosexuals, although, the media loves to spin it as such. Matt Shepard wasn't killed becuase he was light in the loafers.
I hope you realize that The Book of Matt is more or less fiction, right?
Police officials interviewed after Jimenez's book's publication disputed certain claims made in the book. Dave O'Malley, the Laramie police commander over the investigations division at the time of Shepard's murder, said Jimenez's claim that Shepard was "a methamphetamine kingpin is almost humorous. Someone that would buy into that certainly would believe almost anything they read." Rob Debree, lead sheriff's investigator at the time, said the book contains "factual errors and lies", and deemed Jimenez's claim that Shepard was a drug dealer "truly laughable".
I know this doesn't dispute why Matt was killed, but it would be nice to have a better source than a book that tried to make money off of making up a bunch of random junk.
Asmodeanreborn said:I mean, it's a pretty huge claim to make that Shepard was a major meth dealer in Laramie. When you make that kind of accusation, you better be able to somehow back it up, especially when local law enforcement investigators (who certainly would've noticed a change after a major player's death) call it ridiculous.
Once again, I am not saying it was a hate crime, but when you make those kinds of claims (in the book) without proof, it throws a lot of uncertainty on all your other claims as well.
Asmodeanreborn said:Once again, I am not saying it was a hate crime, but when you make those kinds of claims (in the book) without proof, it throws a lot of uncertainty on all your other claims as well.
'PokeForLife said:Asmodeanreborn said:Once again, I am not saying it was a hate crime, but when you make those kinds of claims (in the book) without proof, it throws a lot of uncertainty on all your other claims as well.
Sounds like something that was said quite a bit in the senate this past month...
Not trying to derail the conversation, I just find it comical how people can use the "you can't make an accusation without proof" argument when it suits them and then simultaneously toss it aside when it is inconvenient to their story.
Obviously people on both sides of the aisle do that, which should never be the case. I just wonder how many people notice that they do.