joshvanklomp said:The spread wasn't successful here, why stick with it? Just because that's what the coach you just fired ran?Slow Hand said:I hear you...but on the same hand does it make sense to build a new house every 5 years? When Bohl retires it isn't going to matter what he builds unless we hire another coach that believes in his system.
Bohl was hired because he was successful running his system. Why expect him to run someone else's system? Yeah we might have five wins at this point instead of four, but it also compromises the development and the transition to Bohl's system.
1. I would say that components of the spread were very successful here. Our point output was better than average, we just couldn't stop anyone.
2. Bohl shouldn't be expected to run a style that isn't his. I am not advocating that. All I am suggesting is maybe we should have went after a successful spread coach that could have used components of what we already had and perhaps made the defense better.
However now that we have Bohl, let him build what he wants. I am not advocating getting rid of the guy I am just offering a few counter points.