LanderPoke
Well-known member
He is short, slow, weak arm and can’t process things fast (dumb).
Why is he playing? Give that money back and let someone else play
Why is he playing? Give that money back and let someone else play
I didn’t think he had that good a day. Watching the game he looked much worse than 3-10.3-10 with 28 yards halfway in the 4th. Not good.
Lmao we got a worse Evan Svboda. WowwwEvan Svoboda (2024) vs Tyler Hughes (2026)
Passing
• Svoboda: 56-114, 628 yds, 2 TD, 3 INT, 49.1%, 5.5 Y/A
• Hughes: 66-112, 708 yds, 2 TD, 6 INT, 58.9%, 6.3 Y/A
Rushing
• Svoboda: 51 att, 131 yds, 4 TD, 2.6 Y/A
• Hughes: 52 att, 196 yds, 1 TD, 3.8 Y/A
That’s actually a good point. And they let him come in and not throw. That was weakI'm more patient than most on the forums but I thinks its Sims time, he's got cowboy toughness just like Peasley.
And paying how much more for this pleasure…Lmao we got a worse Evan Svboda. Wowww
Svoboda is the joke of the century. He must have had dirt on Bohl to have hung around. Svoboda is a fine physical specimin but offer nothing else. And Sawful, ever grateful for advice readily agreed to name him starting QB, cos Bohl told him.Evan Svoboda (2024) vs Tyler Hughes (2026)
Passing
• Svoboda: 56-114, 628 yds, 2 TD, 3 INT, 49.1%, 5.5 Y/A
• Hughes: 66-112, 708 yds, 2 TD, 6 INT, 58.9%, 6.3 Y/A
Rushing
• Svoboda: 51 att, 131 yds, 4 TD, 2.6 Y/A
• Hughes: 52 att, 196 yds, 1 TD, 3.8 Y/A
There is a reason why he didn’t play until year 4 on a 7 win team.I had a feeling we were in for rough ride when every W&M fan I talked to had reservations about Hughes ability to perform at the FBS level. Most of them weren't even happy with his performances for W&M. Something I heard over and over was, "His stats look a lot better than he actually was."
He just isn't at the level that a starting QB needs to be at. His one strength, his athleticism, looks to be no better than average for this level. Couple that with poor passing and a really bad ability to read the game, and this just isn't going to work.