Watching the Monty Show replay (Tuesday September 9). They do present some strong arguments for the weak legal position the pee12 may be in. If they (Monty) read this matter correctly, the prospects for the future pee12 financially may be precarious.
My fervent hope is that the poaching and exit fees lawsuits go strongly against the pee12.
Nothing would be sweeter than to see the traitors suffer miserably in full regret of throwing away the opportunity to be the dominant G5 conference for the pipe dream they would replace the ACC and B12.
The prior legal precedence has been established with the SDSU saga a couple of years ago and the ACC debacle filed by Florida State and Clemson that didn’t do anything more than slightly modify the current contract through 2036.
If this judge (Susan Van Kuelen) somehow finds the pee12 vindicated it will set off a new flurry of unprecedented lawsuits.
My view is that worse case scenario this goes into a protracted trial. There sure seems to be plenty of evidence to suggest that everyone agreed knowingly and willingly to the contracts without duress until the pee2 decided to whore themselves to the gullible MWC traitors that they would be involved in a humongous move towards becoming a P level conference.
Nothing will shock me, but I am looking at this as being favorable to the current MWC voting members.
I can think of nothing more enjoyable than the inroads CS-ewe has made with fundraising to implode along with their cohorts.
that the pee12 has to pay in full!