Here's how I look at it. 6 - 7 wins, he probably made the decision he wanted to make to sustain. If that is satisfactory is up to the eye of the beholder. 8+ wins, he likely made a good to really good decision.307bball wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 3:26 pmOk....getting some clarity now....I think I agree on a bad AD decision having a very negative effect almost every time. I think where I get off the bus is, I do not think it works the other way. Maybe if you are the Notre Dame AD skies the limit, but AD's at average G5 programs are constrained in soooo many ways that it's unrealistic to point to the lack of success and lay that wholly at the feet of the AD. Disasters? sure...lack of success is a little more murky. Does that make sense?ragtimejoe1 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 3:09 pm
If he did great, we'll win a NC and he'll be immortal, lol.
For the last part, yes imo. Bohl did his job which means that level of success is attainable within our system. It's Burman's job to now make the right decisions and build upon that even if somewhat incremental. The wheels would be unlikely to fall off in the next few years if Bohl were here which means they shouldn't fall off with Burman's next decisions.
5 wins? I could be convinced that he made the decision he was targeting. Doesn't look good but probably need 1 more year.
< 5 wins means the whole process was bullsh.i.t. Burman, staff, and coaches need to go.