Clock management and substitutions at qb was mind boggling and indefensible. I'd love to hear the Vigen apologists explain that away.
Bohl and Vigen are greatly benefitting from a MUCH weaker schedule. 1 out of 6 years had wins against teams in the upper HALF of college football. The offensive production is 100% the problem. To argue otherwise is asinine. The offense is not sufficient to beat the better teams or even decent teams.
The debate centers on how to fix the offense not if the offense needs fixed. I reject the theory that Bohl is tied to Vigen and also reject the notion that Burman mandates Vigen's firing. Arguing the offense is fine or on track is ridiculous. Let's see what Bohl does. I do know that the offense can't get any worse, so trying anything, moving on from Vigen, for example, is not a risk. The argument that if Vigen goes, Bohl goes, doesn't hold water. That concept is just speculation. Before it starts, I'm not talking about Burman forcing; I'm talking about Bohl choosing to move on.