DocHolliday
Well-known member
"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
seattlecowboy said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
Yeah I was listening. He thinks they will make some noise next week. I sure would like to believe him but I am finding it hard right now. Maybe they will show us something like winning in the quarterfinals for the first time in about 6 or 7 years.
seattlecowboy said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
Yeah I was listening. He thinks they will make some noise next week. I sure would like to believe him but I am finding it hard right now. Maybe they will show us something like winning in the quarterfinals for the first time in about 6 or 7 years.
I actually don't mind Bentz's minutes tonight, there's no way he could hurt us worse than Hank. What frustrated me is Adams. Where are the hell did he go? He has to show up every night. The 1-2 of nance and Adams is unstoppable. If one is off we will not win a game this weekBeaverPoke said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
In general, I agree.
Tonight? Doing things with Jack Bentz for WAY too long, or doing things like not telling someone named Larry or Josh to take over the fucking game and win it? That was not the right way to go.
I absolutely agree with you 100%. See I do read your entire posts.BeaverPoke said:seattlecowboy said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
Yeah I was listening. He thinks they will make some noise next week. I sure would like to believe him but I am finding it hard right now. Maybe they will show us something like winning in the quarterfinals for the first time in about 6 or 7 years.
This season will be an absolute fucking waste unless we win the MWC Tourney. 6 seniors to start the year. MWC pre-season POY. 4 of 5 starters are seniors, 1 is a junior. Year 4 of the Shyatt. These are all the reasons to make the Big Dance and have a MWC title by now.
Win 3 or it's a waste. I am sick of settling. Winning 2 and even winning the NIT, although would be a fun ride, would be a waste.
This team need to win a title and make the dance.
Bentz did all he could to get this team back into the game, and succeeded for the most part. I thought the late 3 by Larry was clutch, but also lucky as hell. For him to chuck up another when we only needed 2 might have cost us the game....ItSucksToBeACSURam said:I actually don't mind Bentz's minutes tonight, there's no way he could hurt us worse than Hank. What frustrated me is Adams. Where are the hell did he go? He has to show up every night. The 1-2 of nance and Adams is unstoppable. If one is off we will not win a game this weekBeaverPoke said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
In general, I agree.
Tonight? Doing things with Jack Bentz for WAY too long, or doing things like not telling someone named Larry or Josh to take over the fucking game and win it? That was not the right way to go.
Might have? That was the worst possible situation, I would have rather seen Adams drive and get mugged and put it on the officials to make or break the game than a contested 3 from Nance. That's my outlook on itPokeTransplant said:Bentz did all he could to get this team back into the game, and succeeded for the most part. I thought the late 3 by Larry was clutch, but also lucky as hell. For him to chuck up another when we only needed 2 might have cost us the game....ItSucksToBeACSURam said:I actually don't mind Bentz's minutes tonight, there's no way he could hurt us worse than Hank. What frustrated me is Adams. Where are the hell did he go? He has to show up every night. The 1-2 of nance and Adams is unstoppable. If one is off we will not win a game this weekBeaverPoke said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
In general, I agree.
Tonight? Doing things with Jack Bentz for WAY too long, or doing things like not telling someone named Larry or Josh to take over the fucking game and win it? That was not the right way to go.
It probably did. But, i'm not going to bag on the guy. Going for the tie was the right move and he missed it.ItSucksToBeACSURam said:Might have? That was the worst possible situation, I would have rather seen Adams drive and get mugged and put it on the officials to make or break the game than a contested 3 from Nance. That's my outlook on itPokeTransplant said:Bentz did all he could to get this team back into the game, and succeeded for the most part. I thought the late 3 by Larry was clutch, but also lucky as hell. For him to chuck up another when we only needed 2 might have cost us the game....ItSucksToBeACSURam said:I actually don't mind Bentz's minutes tonight, there's no way he could hurt us worse than Hank. What frustrated me is Adams. Where are the hell did he go? He has to show up every night. The 1-2 of nance and Adams is unstoppable. If one is off we will not win a game this weekBeaverPoke said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
In general, I agree.
Tonight? Doing things with Jack Bentz for WAY too long, or doing things like not telling someone named Larry or Josh to take over the fucking game and win it? That was not the right way to go.
ItSucksToBeACSURam said:Might have? That was the worst possible situation, I would have rather seen Adams drive and get mugged and put it on the officials to make or break the game than a contested 3 from Nance. That's my outlook on itPokeTransplant said:Bentz did all he could to get this team back into the game, and succeeded for the most part. I thought the late 3 by Larry was clutch, but also lucky as hell. For him to chuck up another when we only needed 2 might have cost us the game....ItSucksToBeACSURam said:I actually don't mind Bentz's minutes tonight, there's no way he could hurt us worse than Hank. What frustrated me is Adams. Where are the hell did he go? He has to show up every night. The 1-2 of nance and Adams is unstoppable. If one is off we will not win a game this weekBeaverPoke said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
In general, I agree.
Tonight? Doing things with Jack Bentz for WAY too long, or doing things like not telling someone named Larry or Josh to take over the fucking game and win it? That was not the right way to go.
GoPokes86 said:ItSucksToBeACSURam said:Might have? That was the worst possible situation, I would have rather seen Adams drive and get mugged and put it on the officials to make or break the game than a contested 3 from Nance. That's my outlook on itPokeTransplant said:Bentz did all he could to get this team back into the game, and succeeded for the most part. I thought the late 3 by Larry was clutch, but also lucky as hell. For him to chuck up another when we only needed 2 might have cost us the game....ItSucksToBeACSURam said:I actually don't mind Bentz's minutes tonight, there's no way he could hurt us worse than Hank. What frustrated me is Adams. Where are the hell did he go? He has to show up every night. The 1-2 of nance and Adams is unstoppable. If one is off we will not win a game this weekBeaverPoke said:DocHolliday said:"We'd like to win them all but I believe it's not always about the end result...it's about how you go about doing things."
In general, I agree.
Tonight? Doing things with Jack Bentz for WAY too long, or doing things like not telling someone named Larry or Josh to take over the fucking game and win it? That was not the right way to go.
We wouldn't have gotten that call, not the way the game was called tonight. I agree, Nance shouldn't have shot the three, but we wouldn't have gotten a call from the refs to put Adams on the line.
ragtimejoe1 said:In 4 years, going from consistent play-in games to upper end of MWC and actually discussing tourney invites is pretty good in my book. I'll take it. Even in a down year, the MWC isn't nearly as craptastic in bball as it is in football. The next 2 years will tell us the most about Shy's program, foundation, and future of this program, IMO.
SDPokeFan said:But in a year when the MWC is decidedly down, and Wyoming has six seniors and its best team in a decade, if the team can't even get to the Big Dance or NIT, what does that say about us?
SDPokeFan said:But in a year when the MWC is decidedly down?
ragtimejoe1 said:SDPokeFan said:But in a year when the MWC is decidedly down?
Though it is a down year, we could still be a 3 bid league. That isn't shabby for a down year.
The down year in bball isn't even in the same stratosphere as down year(s) in football.