• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

ok everyone name their top 2 replacements

7220Fan

Well-known member
Here are my top 2

1). Turner Gill - head coach Buffalo

2). Gus Malzahn - off. coordinator Tulsa - (avg 56 points a game) also drummed New Mexico

Just my 2 top picks.
 
1)Brady Hoke - HC at Ball State, I think here at UW we need a guy who can really "coach" the maximum amount of talent of the players we have here. We are never gonna have 4-5 star recruits. Look what he has done at Ball st.

As for a big name guy, who could bring in some quick recruits and probably use us a stepping stone
2)Gary Barnett. He knows how to win in this area of the country despite his reputation.
 
I only need 1...and I wanna know what you guys think..

Dave Christensen, Asst HC/OC/OL- MISSOURI TIGERS

-2007 Offensive Coordinator of the Year
-Profile:
http://mutigers.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/christensen_dave01.html

Dont waste your money on anyone else...this guy is in his 8th year under Pinkel at Mizz.. and I was at the Nebraska/Missouri game this weekend..their offense isn't just good. saying its potent isn't enough credit. ITS LETHAL!
 
But it's an offense based around having a great QB. We need an offense that can win with 1-3 star recruits running that offense.
 
Sarkisian is an interesting choice since he was a BYU QB.

Mine would be Major Applewhite (OC at Syracuse or Rice or something..), or Paul Wulff from Washington St.
 
MrTitleist said:
Sarkisian is an interesting choice since he was a BYU QB.

Mine would be Major Applewhite (OC at Syracuse or Rice or something..), or Paul Wulff from Washington St.

Wait, wait, wait. You are throwing out a guy's name and you don't even know where he is a coach? Come on Titleist, hard to take you serious on this one here bud. And by the way, he's the associate head coach/running backs coach at Texas.
 
1) Gary Barnett - I think he would be a great recruiter, which is what we need. Cab we pay him enough?

2) Sarkisian from USC - would a BYU guy come to Wyo.?
 
brocksamson said:
MrTitleist said:
Sarkisian is an interesting choice since he was a BYU QB.

Mine would be Major Applewhite (OC at Syracuse or Rice or something..), or Paul Wulff from Washington St.

Wait, wait, wait. You are throwing out a guy's name and you don't even know where he is a coach? Come on Titleist, hard to take you serious on this one here bud. And by the way, he's the associate head coach/running backs coach at Texas.

He's moved around a lot the last few years, I don't keep track of where every assistant goes every year. Last I knew he was at Syracuse w/ Gregg Williams and at Rice.. and apparently at Alabama as well.
 
Cornpoke... I disagree, why couldn't we get 4 star recruits, Boise St gets them, what do they have that we don't, other than a goofy colored field. They have a winning tradition beating up on the WAC, gearing up for OOC games, and going to bowls, and huge summer football camps. If we get a winning tradition back, have a weak non-conf schedule(gearing up for the MWC is enough), and go to some bowls, and host many huge football camps, maybe we could get some 4 star recruits. The only advantages I see them having is larger enrollment, bigger home crowds, ESPN games ... ok maybe they do have some advantages.

Maybe we need to paint our field Brown(blah) or Gold/Yellow(wow that would be hard on my eyes).

We can pay for coaching, we can't for athletes, I am on the pay as much as it takes to have the best staff available and the wins will generate interest/crowds/bowls/recruits/more good coaches/tradition bandwagon. I would love for Wyoming to be that goofy program that pays SEC type money for great coaches out in the middle of nowhere which gets great recruits because they know they are going to get NFL prep type coaching and much playing time because of lack of depth. That would be a great reputation to have. "Oh, your from Wyoming, they have a great football program", "Thank you, stranger."
 
Weren't just about all our QBs 3 star recruits - at least until they decided to sign with Wyoming (and then they got downgraded)? I'm pretty sure Barry was rated pretty high and Crum was too. I don't have any other names to add to this list. Any of these coaches mentioned are good candidates. We need the help of our State Legislators to get the right coach on board - but only with the budget.
I don't mean this as any disrespect, but I sure hope Tom Burman is reading this thread.
 
TKoehn said:
We can pay for coaching, we can't for athletes, I am on the pay as much as it takes to have the best staff available and the wins will generate interest/crowds/bowls/recruits/more good coaches/tradition bandwagon. I would love for Wyoming to be that goofy program that pays SEC type money for great coaches out in the middle of nowhere which gets great recruits because they know they are going to get NFL prep type coaching and much playing time because of lack of depth. That would be a great reputation to have. "Oh, your from Wyoming, they have a great football program", "Thank you, stranger."

Spot on in my opinion! There are plenty of great recruits out there and the real good ones have the next level in mind. First we need a bad ass coach that knows how to win and what it takes to get to the NFL - one that has walked the walk. How many players can Glenn boast he's nurtured to the NFL? Second we need that coach that can convince a stud recruit that being the man at a diamond in the rough is way better than being backed up on a depth chart like you see at the USC's, Texas', and Ohio States of the world. No way will get all or even most but we will see some. This is how we can compete again against BYU, TCU, and Utah as I think they've been using this practice.

I had a good friend that got a full ride to Nebraska. He was a stud as his first year was '95 when they won one of their recent national championships. They have their pick of only the best athletes. However, he saw no substantial playing time his whole career - too deep. I lost touch with him, but I would venture a guess that he at least second guessed his choice once or twice along the way...
 
2005 - Karsten Sween - Rivals 3*, Scout 2*
2006 - Ian Hetrick - Rivals 2*, Scout 3*
2007 - Chris Stutzriem - Rivals 3*, Scout 2*
2008 - Dax Crum - Rivals 3*, Scout 4*
Adam Barry - Rivals 2*, Scout 2* (you are right he was a 3* recruit right until he committed to UW)

Not surprisingly, we signed no 3* O Lineman, only Bolling (Rivals 3*) and Donnelly (Scout 3*) Receivers, Orlando Arnold (Rivals 3*) Tight End, and James Davis (Both 3*) as 3* offensive help in the same time frame.
 
TKoehn said:
2005 - Karsten Sween - Rivals 3*, Scout 2*
2006 - Ian Hetrick - Rivals 2*, Scout 3*
2007 - Chris Stutzriem - Rivals 3*, Scout 2*
2008 - Dax Crum - Rivals 3*, Scout 4*
Adam Barry - Rivals 2*, Scout 2* (you are right he was a 3* recruit right until he committed to UW)

Not surprisingly, we signed no 3* O Lineman, only Bolling (Rivals 3*) and Donnelly (Scout 3*) Receivers, Orlando Arnold (Rivals 3*) Tight End, and James Davis (Both 3*) as 3* offensive help in the same time frame.


That's good info and thanks for the research. This tells me something is wrong with the coaching and not the QBs we have here at UW. With the talent we have on defense, there's no way we should be this bad.
 
Back
Top