http://trib.com/sports/college/wyoming/q-a-incoming-wyoming-president-sternberg-talks-uw-athletics/article_bd6eaa46-9b00-543e-86e6-3d0484b90d59.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Can't help but wonder what that "strong reputation" is, or do I even need to guess?Wyoming has a very strong reputation in intercollegiate athletics and also has many and varied intramural possibilities.
fromolwyoming said:Not a bad interview, but pretty vague at times.
But this part stands out to me most.
Can't help but wonder what that "strong reputation" is, or do I even need to guess?Wyoming has a very strong reputation in intercollegiate athletics and also has many and varied intramural possibilities.
Wyokie said:fromolwyoming said:Not a bad interview, but pretty vague at times.
But this part stands out to me most.
Can't help but wonder what that "strong reputation" is, or do I even need to guess?Wyoming has a very strong reputation in intercollegiate athletics and also has many and varied intramural possibilities.
Can't help to think he'll keep Burman as AD. I would love to be wrong though.
laxwyo said:Wyokie said:fromolwyoming said:Not a bad interview, but pretty vague at times.
But this part stands out to me most.
Can't help but wonder what that "strong reputation" is, or do I even need to guess?Wyoming has a very strong reputation in intercollegiate athletics and also has many and varied intramural possibilities.
Can't help to think he'll keep Burman as AD. I would love to be wrong though.
You must be a lee moon kind of guy
It takes more than a President for that to happen.Wyokie said:Hated Lee Moon. I'm a Roach guy. Want to see the football team win championships, not chicken shit!
J-Rod said:It takes more than a President for that to happen.Wyokie said:Hated Lee Moon. I'm a Roach guy. Want to see the football team win championships, not chicken shit!
And? Believing Burman is at the root of all UW's athletics issues is simply ridiculous.Wyokie said:Presidents can fire ADs.
J-Rod said:And? Believing Burman is at the root of all UW's athletics issues is simply ridiculous.Wyokie said:Presidents can fire ADs.
I won't claim to have the answers. Its just completely illogical to think UW will randomly become awesome or suck because of these specific authorities.Wyokie said:O.K. how would you fix things?
J-Rod said:I won't claim to have the answers. Its just completely illogical to think UW will randomly become awesome or suck because of these specific authorities.Wyokie said:O.K. how would you fix things?
It very well could, I'm just not buying the "winter would turn into spring" argument simply because of a president or AD change.Wyo2dal said:It can certainly turn things the right direction replacing specific authorities that are possibly holding the athletics back.
laxwyo said:Wyokie said:fromolwyoming said:Not a bad interview, but pretty vague at times.
But this part stands out to me most.
Can't help but wonder what that "strong reputation" is, or do I even need to guess?Wyoming has a very strong reputation in intercollegiate athletics and also has many and varied intramural possibilities.
Can't help to think he'll keep Burman as AD. I would love to be wrong though.
You must be a lee moon kind of guy
The Virginian said:I'm not saying that Burman should be retained, but a replacement could be much worse. God forbid that we get another Lee Moon as AD. In my mind he's very much to blame for the state of Wyoming athletics we find ourself in. Bottom line, be careful what you wish for.
See, I can agree with this as well.......Burman has been quite conservative in his time at UW, not very proactive. But with that said, TheVirginian's point remains.....everyone assumes the next AD will be better than Burman....that is not necessarily the case.McPeachy said:I think the major point that is being overlooked...
Burman is no visionary. He isn't a go-getter. He dummies everything down, to a managable level he is comfortable with. He is satisified with a $25 million dollar athletic budget, and competing with teams that have that similar budget.
We can name names, coaches, successes and failures, and there are all of those evident in Burman's tenure. But the complete lack of aspiration from within the UW athletic department to be the best, is quite telling.
J-Rod said:See, I can agree with this as well.......Burman has been quite conservative in his time at UW, not very proactive. But with that said, TheVirginian's point remains.....everyone assumes the next AD will be better than Burman....that is not necessarily the case.
Ugh....I remember when Hawaii fired Herman Frazier. Botched the BCS bowl ticket allotment, ruined future schedules, financially ruined the department, lost June Jones. Everyone assumed we were free! The tyrant is gone!
How's that freedom looking? Not too good.....not too good.
100% behind this post, THIS is the problem with staying this course. APATHY, NO THANK YOU.McPeachy said:I think the major point that is being overlooked...
Burman is no visionary. He isn't a go-getter. He dummies everything down, to a managable level he is comfortable with. He is satisified with a $25 million dollar athletic budget, and competing with teams that have that similar budget.
We can name names, coaches, successes and failures, and there are all of those evident in Burman's tenure. But the complete lack of aspiration from within the UW athletic department to be the best, is quite telling.
McPeachy said:Well...the next guy may or may not be any better. Such is true with damn near any HR situation. But with that mentality, or outlook, things are doomed for UW athletics. What do you do...stay satisfied with being consistently shitty-mediocre, or take a chance to break out and be good (not great, just good). Not asking to be world beaters in year one of a new AD...but we need a visionary. We need our version of Jack Graham...you know, the guy (or girl) with balls, vision, connections, skills, desire, goals, and a gut-level spirit for the great state of Wyoming.