• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

I guarantee Pittser and Kirkegaard will outperform Smith.

T

theman

Well-known member
First of all I want to say I like Brett Smith and wouldn't mind him being the QB. That said, the stupidity of most human beings NEVER EVER ceases to amaze me.

Brett Smith Played with the Starting O-line, Starting Wide Receivers, Starting RB's and he played against the Backup D-Line, Backup D-backs, & Backup LB's.

Pittser Played with the Backup O-line, Backup Wide Receivers, Backup RB's and he played against the Starting D-Line, Starting D-backs, & Starting LB's.

SO WHY THE HELL IS EVERYONE SO GOD DAMN SURPRISED THAT SMITH OUTPERFORMED THE OTHER QB'S?
HE WAS SETUP TO SUCCEED AND PITTSER WAS SETUP TO FAIL. IT'S THAT SIMPLE.

Give Pittser the Starting Offense vs. The Backup Defense and then Watch Smith with the Backup Offense vs. the Starting Defense and then Every goddamn moron will say how great Pittser is.

1 question. Why are people so fvcking stupid? :? WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
 
I think most people realize what all the QB's had to work with. However, you can't call a person stupid if they get excited by what Smith did yesterday. When is the last time we had a QB play this well in a first scrimmage?

I also think most people realize Pittser and the JC guy are fresh to the system, while Smith was here for spring drills. Smith has had time to learn the offense and ran a spread offense in high school.

Both Pittser and the JC guy will get their chances and I'm sure will close the gap. I'm just excited about the fact we had a freshman QB step up and perform better than expected.
 
theman said:
First of all I want to say I like Brett Smith and wouldn't mind him being the QB. That said, the stupidity of most human beings NEVER EVER ceases to amaze me.

Brett Smith Played with the Starting O-line, Starting Wide Receivers, Starting RB's and he played against the Backup D-Line, Backup D-backs, & Backup LB's.

Pittser Played with the Backup O-line, Backup Wide Receivers, Backup RB's and he played against the Starting D-Line, Starting D-backs, & Starting LB's.

SO WHY THE HELL IS EVERYONE SO GOD DAMN SURPRISED THAT SMITH OUTPERFORMED THE OTHER QB'S?
HE WAS SETUP TO SUCCEED AND PITTSER WAS SETUP TO FAIL. IT'S THAT SIMPLE.

Give Pittser the Starting Offense vs. The Backup Defense and then Watch Smith with the Backup Offense vs. the Starting Defense and then Every goddamn moron will say how great Pittser is.

1 question. Why are people so fvcking stupid? :? WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
Click to expand...
Stop over reacting. Everyone realizes where each QB played at and what they had. We're just glad we had a QB actually perform really well in the first fall scrimmage. And I myself pointed out the advantages that Smith had for the scrimmage (been here for the Spring practice and ran the spread in high school for 4 years). So take a chill pill. People are just happy that we had a QB that performed really well. That's all.
 
What's your problem? It's not like they gave all the #1 reps to Smith because "they like him better" and they want to set him up. He's obviously ahead of both other QB's so they gave him reps with the #1's. No one has said that Smith will end up being #1, they have just said he is ahead of the other two QB's. I doubt Pittser would have hit his first 16 passes with the #1's. With time, I hope Pittser picks up the offense and challenges Smith.

What has Pittser and Kirkegaard done that makes you think they are so much better? So, Pittser has a good arm and can impress some people when he's throwing and nobody is in his face while wearing warmups? That automatically makes him better? If he was so badass as you think, he should of tore up our #1 D even with the #2's. It's not surprising that he didn't have a great day against the #1's.

I think most of us were just surprised at how well Smith did yesterday. It's also good to see him making great decisions and delivering the ball on target.

I am thinking that you aren't much of a UW fan. If you were, you would be rooting for all the QB's to do well and the best one to rise to the top. You seem to be rooting for Smith to fall on his face, which makes you an asshole. I can't remember a QB having that kind of day against the #2's in quite a while. It was near flawless. We are not stupid because we recognize he had a good day. I think you are stupid because you can't recognize how well he did. That being said, maybe he doesn't perform well from here no out. Maybe Pittser comes out on top. Either way, if Smith beats out Pittser or Pittser beats out Smith, I think it means we are going to have one hell of a QB even as a frosh.

Did Smith fuck your sister or something?
 
laxwyo said:
What's your problem? It's not like they gave all the #1 reps to Smith because "they like him better" and they want to set him up. He's obviously ahead of both other QB's so they gave him reps with the #1's. No one has said that Smith will end up being #1, they have just said he is ahead of the other two QB's. I doubt Pittser would have hit his first 16 passes with the #1's. With time, I hope Pittser picks up the offense and challenges Smith.

What has Pittser and Kirkegaard done that makes you think they are so much better? So, Pittser has a good arm and can impress some people when he's throwing and nobody is in his face while wearing warmups? That automatically makes him better? If he was so badass as you think, he should of tore up our #1 D even with the #2's. It's not surprising that he didn't have a great day against the #1's.

I think most of us were just surprised at how well Smith did yesterday. It's also good to see him making great decisions and delivering the ball on target.

I am thinking that you aren't much of a UW fan. If you were, you would be rooting for all the QB's to do well and the best one to rise to the top. You seem to be rooting for Smith to fall on his face, which makes you an a##hole. I can't remember a QB having that kind of day against the #2's in quite a while. It was near flawless. We are not stupid because we recognize he had a good day. I think you are stupid because you can't recognize how well he did. That being said, maybe he doesn't perform well from here no out. Maybe Pittser comes out on top. Either way, if Smith beats out Pittser or Pittser beats out Smith, I think it means we are going to have one hell of a QB even as a frosh.

Did Smith f##k your sister or something?
Click to expand...


We need a handclapping smiley.
 
theman said:
First of all I want to say I like Brett Smith and wouldn't mind him being the QB. That said, the stupidity of most human beings NEVER EVER ceases to amaze me.

Brett Smith Played with the Starting O-line, Starting Wide Receivers, Starting RB's and he played against the Backup D-Line, Backup D-backs, & Backup LB's.

Pittser Played with the Backup O-line, Backup Wide Receivers, Backup RB's and he played against the Starting D-Line, Starting D-backs, & Starting LB's.

SO WHY THE HELL IS EVERYONE SO GOD DAMN SURPRISED THAT SMITH OUTPERFORMED THE OTHER QB'S?
HE WAS SETUP TO SUCCEED AND PITTSER WAS SETUP TO FAIL. IT'S THAT SIMPLE.

Give Pittser the Starting Offense vs. The Backup Defense and then Watch Smith with the Backup Offense vs. the Starting Defense and then Every goddamn moron will say how great Pittser is.

1 question. Why are people so fvcking stupid? :? WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
Click to expand...


I wouldn't make that guarantee, bud. Everyone knows the way that the scrim was set-up and it is really irrelavant. According to CDC he does it against the #1's in practice everyday. Besides, we heard and saw Smith play in the Spring mainly with the #2's (same guys as Pittser) against the #1's and #2's and the kid completed over 75% of his passes and was the best QB coming out of the Spring. The difference that many on here don't want to seem to acknowledge is the single greatest seperater between Smith and the rest of the QB's currently is that a play will never be dead with Brett Smith back there. Brandon said it-"Smith scrambled out threw it and ran it." Pittser may have a stronger arm but he is nowhere near the runner that Smith is and in this offense you have to have that. Smith was one of the leading rushers in the Spring and will always have the ability to continue the play. The other guys don't give you that. Wait until the contact comes people. It will be then that you will see the true essence of this kid. There is a big part of his game that people haven't even seen yet and can only be seen when he is "live." Oh, and one other thing, this isn't a popularity contest between Smith and Pittser or Kirkengaard or anyone else. It's about productivity and who gives us the best opportunity to win... now! Sometimes on here it seems like that. Go Pokes!
 
Asmodeanreborn said:
laxwyo said:
What's your problem? It's not like they gave all the #1 reps to Smith because "they like him better" and they want to set him up. He's obviously ahead of both other QB's so they gave him reps with the #1's. No one has said that Smith will end up being #1, they have just said he is ahead of the other two QB's. I doubt Pittser would have hit his first 16 passes with the #1's. With time, I hope Pittser picks up the offense and challenges Smith.

What has Pittser and Kirkegaard done that makes you think they are so much better? So, Pittser has a good arm and can impress some people when he's throwing and nobody is in his face while wearing warmups? That automatically makes him better? If he was so badass as you think, he should of tore up our #1 D even with the #2's. It's not surprising that he didn't have a great day against the #1's.

I think most of us were just surprised at how well Smith did yesterday. It's also good to see him making great decisions and delivering the ball on target.

I am thinking that you aren't much of a UW fan. If you were, you would be rooting for all the QB's to do well and the best one to rise to the top. You seem to be rooting for Smith to fall on his face, which makes you an a##hole. I can't remember a QB having that kind of day against the #2's in quite a while. It was near flawless. We are not stupid because we recognize he had a good day. I think you are stupid because you can't recognize how well he did. That being said, maybe he doesn't perform well from here no out. Maybe Pittser comes out on top. Either way, if Smith beats out Pittser or Pittser beats out Smith, I think it means we are going to have one hell of a QB even as a frosh.

Did Smith f##k your sister or something?
Click to expand...


We need a handclapping smiley.
Click to expand...

:clap:
 
A time share is inevitable. They'll have a chance to prove it on the field. I don't care what anyone says, Wyoming has 3 QBs contending with zero FBS experience. They can look good in practice all they like, they'll struggle regardless in a real game. It will be up to those three who emerges as "the guy".
 
I never said I like the other Qb's better than Smith.. From what I've heard about Smith, I'm pretty excited. I just want a winner back there.
But if you want to test Brett Smith, then you need to have him lineup behind the 2nd string offensive line who are being manhandled by the first string defensive line. Then give him the 2nd string RB's who are getting eaten up by the Starting Linebackers. Then have him TRY to throw to the Backup WR's who are being blanketed by the Starting Corners and Safeties. The results would be bad, and it really doesn't matter if you put peyton manning back there either.

Ok lets see if you sheeple can understand this:
Take for example if these players were in their prime. Who would "perform" better? (have better stats)

Adam Pittser throwing to Randy Moss being covered by James Caraway?
OR
Peyton Manning throwing to Spencer Bruce being covered by Deion Sanders?


I'M TAKING ADAM PITTSER... But this in no way means he is a better QB than Peyton Manning.

The Real Question is, Will Christenson see What Pittser can do with the #1 offense vs. the #2 defense.
Also, See if Smith Fails with the #2 offense vs. The #1 defense.

Until we see that, all the stats, stories, posts, and hype don't mean schit to anyone with half a brain.
My guess is we will never see this because of the depression and questions that would follow. :king:
 
McPeachy said:
I know this isn't "PC" or anything...

But this thread has my vote for most retarded of 2011.
Click to expand...

This board isn't for the "PC" types. That honor goes to...............GWG!
 
I'm sure Pittser will get his time w/ the 1's vs. the 2's at some point and vice versa for Brett Smith. I think it's much ado about nothing since we're only 1 scrimmage in. We'll know quite a bit more after Friday's scrim.
 
good lord. How do we respond to positive results? With negative outbursts.

Dont get me wrong, I like pittser from videos. But he has a long way to go to understanding a spread system. I think his arm is special. But thats not going to carry us to victory. We need somebody to make decisions with the ball quickly without turnovers. Captain Kirkegaard, Im not sure about. I saw some video of the day 1 practice where he was throwing. He has a strange delivery. I cant nail it down yet, but its something with his throwing hand motion. Number 11 right? I cant find the video anymore... they may have deleted it off the internet.

smith is definetly more game ready. If he can continue to make quick decisions... I honestly dont see us rotating qbs. Pittser will not be ready. Captain Kirk will probably see the field if smith goes down to injury, or has a day of interceptions. But if smith continues like this, why rotate qbs? That doesnt make any sense... even if we are up by 30 points in the fourth quarter.

Lastly, I think Gregg Brandon is the blessing that this team has needed more than a 5* quarterback. Good play calling and personnel management is going to make this offense go. More of a question to our success this year has to do with oline performance.

And yes, we should see how pittser and captain kirk perform with the first team. But i highly doubt they will have an 85-90% completion rate for 330 yards and 3 touchdowns. We have three more scrimmages to go. Im just damn happy that we look efficient and balanced for the first time since 96.
 
carbonpoke said:
smith is definetly more game ready. If he can continue to make quick decisions... I honestly dont see us rotating qbs. Pittser will not be ready. Captain Kirk will probably see the field if smith goes down to injury, or has a day of interceptions. But if smith continues like this, why rotate qbs? That doesnt make any sense... even if we are up by 30 points in the fourth quarter.
.
Click to expand...

I completely agree with this. In a perfect world Smith will do great in the next couple scrimmages and make the decision to start him easy and then red shirt Pittser and have Kirk back up smith this year. Give Pittser a year to learn the spread and next year to see if he could out perform Smith. I doubt this will happen and they will both play this year which is ok too.
 
Let me add that our past Qb wouldn't have completed 16 passes in a row with just him and 1 receiver on the field, so people are naturally a little excited. I stated in a post yesterday that this was Pittsers first live scrimmage and things are moving pretty fast for him right now, as he gets more reps either with the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd string things will start to slow down for him. The race for a starter is far from over. This choosing sides bullshit is moronic. Like most fans, I just want the guy with the best chance to give us wins starting. That will be up to DC and Brandon to choose. They have 3 plus weeks of practice and 3 more srums to go, just let it play out. Lastly, to the op, who on this board said they were surprised by yesterdays results? I think your fvcking stupid for posting what you did. Now are we even with the name calling? :nutkick:
 
theman said:
I never said I like the other Qb's better than Smith.. From what I've heard about Smith, I'm pretty excited. I just want a winner back there.
But if you want to test Brett Smith, then you need to have him lineup behind the 2nd string offensive line who are being manhandled by the first string defensive line. Then give him the 2nd string RB's who are getting eaten up by the Starting Linebackers. Then have him TRY to throw to the Backup WR's who are being blanketed by the Starting Corners and Safeties. The results would be bad, and it really doesn't matter if you put peyton manning back there either.
Ok lets see if you sheeple can understand this:
Take for example if these players were in their prime. Who would "perform" better? (have better stats)
Adam Pittser throwing to Randy Moss being covered by James Caraway?
OR
Peyton Manning throwing to Spencer Bruce being covered by Deion Sanders?
I'M TAKING ADAM PITTSER... But this in no way means he is a better QB than Peyton Manning.
The Real Question is, Will Christenson see What Pittser can do with the #1 offense vs. the #2 defense.
Also, See if Smith Fails with the #2 offense vs. The #1 defense.
Until we see that, all the stats, stories, posts, and hype don't mean schit to anyone with half a brain.
My guess is we will never see this because of the depression and questions that would follow. :king:
Click to expand...
First off you started this thread like a moron who doesn't know any better. This "sheeple" shit is getting retarded aswell.
Secondly, Brett Smith has played with the # 2's. That is all he played with during spring ball. Might I add, completing 65% of his passes also. So you have no argument there. He earned the number 1 spot.
And, if our second string is offense is so bad, why did kirkegaard go 19-25-97-0-0? Comparatively to Pittser's 9-21-77-1-1 with the same offense.
Now, your comparison to peyton manning to Pittser; Randy Moss to Spencer Bruce; and James Caraway to Deion Sanders is Laughable! Especially when you are for some reason wanting to Compare Pittser and Smith and then leave Smith completely out of the equation. :lol:
So, your answer to your "real" question is Smith has earned being number 1 right now, as I referred to it earlier in this post. And will stay until some one beats him out or if he starts to become lackadaisical, which i highly doubt. Which means Pittser needs to step up to the same type of numbers Smith had with the number 2's in Spring ball. And until we see that, then the hype stands for any true Cowboy fan who has any kind of football knowledge at all! In this case I'm starting to doubt yours. Why can't Cowboy fans get excited when good actually happens for this team? Why does negativity always seem to abound at every little detail? I guarantee you don't see crap like this on most other teams threads. :brick:
 
theman said:
The Real Question is, Will Christenson see What Pittser can do with the #1 offense vs. the #2 defense.
Also, See if Smith Fails with the #2 offense vs. The #1 defense. Until we see that, all the stats, stories, posts, and hype don't mean schit to anyone with half a brain.My guess is we will never see this because of the depression and questions that would follow. :king:
Click to expand...

Wrong. The real question is what Smith is going to do against Weber St. I can guarantee that if we are struggling with Smith, another QB is going to get a shot and vice versa. You're right, all the stats and stories don't mean shit, but at least they can build some excitement. Is it wrong to get excited about your football team instead of dreading the offensive output.

This is Smith's job to lose and not just because of his scrimmage. He's had 15 more practices and even against the #2's, he's shown an uncanny grasp of the system so early in the fall. Pittser needs to take it from him. Even if Pittser takes it from him and does well in the first half of the Weber game, we will see Smith at some point. It's more likely that Smith gets the starting gig and if he does well stays in the whole game. If he struggles a bit, I'm sure we will see Pittser.

And....you're a douche!
 
I wouldn't get to excited or worried either way right now as it was the very 1st scrimmage and it really doesn't mean a whole lot.

Two years ago Robert Benjamin was running all over the feild the first scrimmage for touchdowns and everyone thought he would be the savior after one scrimmage and then we all know how that ended up. ACS ended up starting by the 3rd game because he was the better QB.

I think Pittser has more raw talent than Smith or Captain Kirk but Smith is more ready to play right now because he was in for the spring. It really doesn't matter as long as whoever the QB is can get wins.

I would say once Pittser gets the offense down he will end up taking over but if he doesn't as long as Smith wins then that is what matters. Besides any QB's getting stats in a scrimmage against our defense doesn't really tell me anything. I want to see how they perform against a conference opponent like TCU, Boise St. or Nebraska.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top