One of the first big changes Bohl made was "double repping," where two sets of offensive and defensive units are running plays at all times.
"It's definitely different for sure," said Rufran. "But it does give everybody on the team a fair chance, and that way you're not gonna have many Negative Nancies trying to say they never had a shot (to show what they could do.)"
That said, once Rufran heals up and can get back into practice, I think he'll be 1st string. He proved to be our most reliable reciever last season.Asmodeanreborn said:One of the first big changes Bohl made was "double repping," where two sets of offensive and defensive units are running plays at all times.
"It's definitely different for sure," said Rufran. "But it does give everybody on the team a fair chance, and that way you're not gonna have many Negative Nancies trying to say they never had a shot (to show what they could do.)"
Guess we definitely saw who those were. Good on you for calling it the way it is, Rufran.
hithere said:But, whoever came up with the headline on this article can fuck right off. So sick of reading this tired shit.
BeaverPoke said:We are THE toughest job for sure.
LasCrucesPoke said:Agree to disagree. Go pokes, maybe the nightmare will end soon.
BackHarlowRoad said:BeaverPoke said:We are THE toughest job for sure.
FIFY
LasCrucesPoke said:And as someone who attended NMSU, hence "lascrucespoke", I don't know why it's soooo much harder to win Las Cruces than Laramie, but it is. Go hang out with those guys, we'll tell you what it's really like to be on the bottom. We have one winning season in like 30 years, one bowl appearance EVER, and had no conference this year. When I get there the first thing I noticed is their facilities and atmosphere versus Wyoming's made the pokes look like the New England Patriots. Think about how sad that is.
LasCrucesPoke said:Yes but we're grading on a curve here. The argument was not based on recruiting, at least in terms of the BCS schools. The argument was are any of those schools mentioned closer to winning a conference championship in their conference than we are in ours? I would say no except for maybe wazzu, but they are nowhere close either. They are as competitive in their league with leach as we were the first couple years of the DC era in ours. Utah State, I don't know. They're the country school in their state. Their recruiting base is definitely better than ours. Their facilities right now are meh, fan support meh, budget is lower. They could be turning a corner. They were in the dumpster not too long ago, a Jacob doss led joe Glenn team beat them 24-7 in 06. They have only recently struck gold especially now in the MW. I'll say the same for SJSU. Better weather. Better football? Meh. There are still lots of schools on that list besides. Toughest job no. Top 5 no. Top 20, right now especially with our administration, very possible.
Meh.....USU will be doing some major rebuilding in 2015. Attrition and coaches leaving make it hard on a small budget program. Plus, they've played the MW's easiest schedule by far. They only played two MW teams with winning records in Boise and CSU, CSU they won 13-0....Boise's worst team in 15 years beat the shit out of them for 3 quarters in Logan before the dogs were called off. Don't get me wrong, USU has made huge improvements....but ask me again in 2017, and I'd bet we won't be talking about them like this anymore.BeaverPoke said:Are you kidding me?
Utah State played in the conference championship game last season!
How are we closer to winning a conference title than them? They are returning Chuckie Keaton this season. We lost Brett Smith AND the back up who was going to replace him.
I thought I wore the brown and gold glasses here.
We are so far behind with the departure of Brett Smith it's not even funny.