Another lawsuit

[PorkerPoke]

This isn't snarky; honest question. Do you know GCU side of the story? I honestly don't. Did they have some scheduling issue or was it something that was done to help them out?

If so, the MWC has a precedence here...wsu and osu. The pac defects need to stop bitching. Honor their contractual obligations and pay up.

GCU got basically nothing in conference revenue from the WAC. The contract they had with the WAC was expired. They were going to join the WCC in July 2025 but then Gonzaga left the WCC. The WCC is suing them for not paying the entire entry fee and the exit fee. I don’t know what the status is of that lawsuit. GCU would have been an independent effective July 1, 2025 since they had accepted joining the MWC in November 2024. GCU did make an initial entry payment to the WCC before being sued.

GCU was accepted as a member as well as UTEP and NIU while the traitors were still members. The MWC had made an offer to Texas State as well while the traitors were still members. So the traitors had full participation up to the end of June 2025 when they voluntarily submitted resignations they knew terminated their voting rights.

Here is where it gets interesting. Texas State had not received an official invitation from the pee12 at that time and neither conference had a media deal effective July 2026. Texas State opted to stay in the Sun Belt where at tops their conference income was about $2.4 million. I have heard speculation that Texas State received suggestions they wait for a better deal. Could that have been influenced by the traitors leaving when they were still MWC members? Because at that point the traitors were privy to the MWC terms of offer to Texas State. Did that information get to the pee12 where they were able to tell Texas State they would get a better deal?

The MWC could do very little while the traitors under the bylaws had a voice in every last move the MWC wanted to do (even while they were already suing the MWC). The MWC didn’t want to include the traitors in much of anything exactly because of potential sabotage by the pee12 and the lawsuit issues.

If the MWC is sticking the fork in the traitors according to the terms of the bylaws then I am glad and hope the fork is twisted while being pushed deeper.

This is 100% about the pee12 and the traitors avoiding paying as much as possible. They got themselves into this thinking they were the newest version of sliced bread with so much money flowing in every G6 program would be salivating to join.

The traitors will get the standard conference pay for 2025-26. But, future credits have already been forfeited with the resignations.

 

[Brew_Poke]

The MWC accelerating the addition of GCU is going to come back to haunt them.

While I think the departing schools are overreacting a bit, they are right that they should have a say on if GCU can join the conference this year while they are still members of the conference.

I'm not clear to me what the MWC gains from adding GCU a year early, other than it being a bit of a parting shot at the schools that are leaving. It's a low blow move from the MWC. I don't like it and don't support the addition of GCU this year.

We helped out a new. Business partner who needed a hand. We are in business with GCU, the PACstabbers can get fucked.

 

[Brew_Poke]

But the MWC had GCU lined up to be added beginning in the fall of 2026. Why did they need to all of a sudden accelerate their addition up to fall of 2025?

I am assuming that the conference revenue will now be distributed amongst another school for this coming season. That has to be beyond just a minor financial set back for the departing schools and why I called it a low blow.

If GCU has agreed to forego conference revenue this season, then I take back everything I said. But I haven’t heard anything to suggest that is case.

Because otherwise GCU, our partner, was looking at a year of independence, which could kill their program. They're a partner.

 

[Itsux2beaewe]

Here is where it gets interesting. Texas State had not received an official invitation from the pee12 at that time and neither conference had a media deal effective July 2026. Texas State opted to stay in the Sun Belt where at tops their conference income was about $2.4 million. I have heard speculation that Texas State received suggestions they wait for a better deal. Could that have been influenced by the traitors leaving when they were still MWC members? Because at that point the traitors were privy to the MWC terms of offer to Texas State. Did that information get to the pee12 where they were able to tell Texas State they would get a better deal?

I have no doubt this Tom Foolery happened by the conniving corrupt whiny babies.