Meh. I don't really favor either team in this. Both defenses are bad.laxwyo said:Donks kinda got screwed on thar INT. PI pretty bad
fromolwyoming said:Falcons defense reminded me of ours last year. Missed tackles, not wrapping, dominated at the line of scrimmage...
However, if Air Forces recievers didn't have stone hands, the game would have been much closer. They have a pretty good dual threat QB there, just the recievers didn't help him.
That said, anyone else notice BSU ripping off our Beer Song?
Same story as last week against USU. Practically the same scenario.fromolwyoming said:However, if Air Forces recievers didn't have stone hands, the game would have been much closer. They have a pretty good dual threat QB there, just the recievers didn't help him.
J-Rod said:Same story as last week against USU. Practically the same scenario.fromolwyoming said:However, if Air Forces recievers didn't have stone hands, the game would have been much closer. They have a pretty good dual threat QB there, just the recievers didn't help him.
Only about 20 people sang it, and it was background, but yes, they stole it. Even had the band playing it.BeaverPoke said:J-Rod said:Same story as last week against USU. Practically the same scenario.fromolwyoming said:However, if Air Forces recievers didn't have stone hands, the game would have been much closer. They have a pretty good dual threat QB there, just the recievers didn't help him.
I could care less about the game now, did Boise State really steal the beer song?
fromolwyoming said:Only about 20 people sang it, and it was background, but yes, they stole it. Even had the band playing it.BeaverPoke said:J-Rod said:Same story as last week against USU. Practically the same scenario.fromolwyoming said:However, if Air Forces recievers didn't have stone hands, the game would have been much closer. They have a pretty good dual threat QB there, just the recievers didn't help him.
I could care less about the game now, did Boise State really steal the beer song?