Asmodeanreborn said:It's going to get worse before it gets better. A lot worse.
It's so weird watching this going on, but I suppose that just shows me how much of a bubble I live in. Riots have always been a part of this country, and apparently that's also how it's changed for the better in the past, so maybe that's the case this time around as well? Or not, but one can dare hope, at least, while also feeling pain for victims both of the violence and the ones losing their livelihood to those taking advantage of the chaos to sow further discord.
Please tell me one instance where "riots" led to change for the better? I didn't realize that destroying personal property and looting are good things. You have some moronic views. People who want to go out in public without a mask are like drunk drivers. Yet, thugs setting cars and buildings ablaze are agents of positive change.
bladerunnr said:Please tell me one instance where "riots" led to change for the better? I didn't realize that destroying personal property and looting are good things. You have some moronic views. People who want to go out in public without a mask are like drunk drivers. Yet, thugs setting cars and buildings ablaze are agents of positive change.
Asmodeanreborn said:bladerunnr said:Please tell me one instance where "riots" led to change for the better? I didn't realize that destroying personal property and looting are good things. You have some moronic views. People who want to go out in public without a mask are like drunk drivers. Yet, thugs setting cars and buildings ablaze are agents of positive change.
The Boston Tea Party is probably the first and most important one.
I'm not claiming riots are positive, nor am I supporting them. I'm claiming that sometimes they do lead to positive change, no matter how much they also ruin.
I'd normally bite on your other stuff too, but there's really no point to it. People not knowing how to control their emotions is a huge part of this mess to begin with, so I suppose I can at least try myself?
LanderPoke said:crazy that some people are defending the violence and looting. Asinine. Everyone that can be ID'd doing a crime better be prosecuted.
bladerunnr said:Asmodeanreborn said:bladerunnr said:Please tell me one instance where "riots" led to change for the better? I didn't realize that destroying personal property and looting are good things. You have some moronic views. People who want to go out in public without a mask are like drunk drivers. Yet, thugs setting cars and buildings ablaze are agents of positive change.
The Boston Tea Party is probably the first and most important one.
I'm not claiming riots are positive, nor am I supporting them. I'm claiming that sometimes they do lead to positive change, no matter how much they also ruin.
I'd normally bite on your other stuff too, but there's really no point to it. People not knowing how to control their emotions is a huge part of this mess to begin with, so I suppose I can at least try myself?
The Boston Tea party was not a 'riot". Tea was dumped into the Boston harbor in protest. Businesses were not burned and looted. I'd like to know the positive change you think is going to happen from this. The officer has been charged. There is an ongoing investigation. Minneapolis has a black police chief already. Perhaps the goal is to make all white people feel guilty over the actions of one person? We live in a country with 330 million people. To take one incident and make it indicative of the nation at large is questionable, at best.
WestWYOPoke said:bladerunnr said:Asmodeanreborn said:bladerunnr said:Please tell me one instance where "riots" led to change for the better? I didn't realize that destroying personal property and looting are good things. You have some moronic views. People who want to go out in public without a mask are like drunk drivers. Yet, thugs setting cars and buildings ablaze are agents of positive change.
The Boston Tea Party is probably the first and most important one.
I'm not claiming riots are positive, nor am I supporting them. I'm claiming that sometimes they do lead to positive change, no matter how much they also ruin.
I'd normally bite on your other stuff too, but there's really no point to it. People not knowing how to control their emotions is a huge part of this mess to begin with, so I suppose I can at least try myself?
The Boston Tea party was not a 'riot". Tea was dumped into the Boston harbor in protest. Businesses were not burned and looted. I'd like to know the positive change you think is going to happen from this. The officer has been charged. There is an ongoing investigation. Minneapolis has a black police chief already. Perhaps the goal is to make all white people feel guilty over the actions of one person? We live in a country with 330 million people. To take one incident and make it indicative of the nation at large is questionable, at best.
By definition, a riot is "a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd." So by that definition, the Boston Tea Party was very much a riot. Neither I, nor do I think anyone on WyoNation, is defending rioting and looting. But I think those that are peacefully protesting A) have the right to do so, and B) certainly have a reason for why they are.
To suggest that this is only 1 incident is very short-sighted. This may have been the final straw that sparked these riots, but there are hundreds, thousands of incidents over the last several decades that have led to this. This didn't start with George Floyd, nor, sadly, will it end with him.
Just remember, a few bad people do not characterize an entire group. Just how not all police officers are racist, murderers; not all protesters are violent "thugs" looking to loot and riot.
Remember the kneeling protests about the killing of unarmed black men during national anthems that were called "Un-American"? So, yeah.bladerunnr said:WestWYOPoke said:bladerunnr said:Asmodeanreborn said:bladerunnr said:Please tell me one instance where "riots" led to change for the better? I didn't realize that destroying personal property and looting are good things. You have some moronic views. People who want to go out in public without a mask are like drunk drivers. Yet, thugs setting cars and buildings ablaze are agents of positive change.
The Boston Tea Party is probably the first and most important one.
I'm not claiming riots are positive, nor am I supporting them. I'm claiming that sometimes they do lead to positive change, no matter how much they also ruin.
I'd normally bite on your other stuff too, but there's really no point to it. People not knowing how to control their emotions is a huge part of this mess to begin with, so I suppose I can at least try myself?
The Boston Tea party was not a 'riot". Tea was dumped into the Boston harbor in protest. Businesses were not burned and looted. I'd like to know the positive change you think is going to happen from this. The officer has been charged. There is an ongoing investigation. Minneapolis has a black police chief already. Perhaps the goal is to make all white people feel guilty over the actions of one person? We live in a country with 330 million people. To take one incident and make it indicative of the nation at large is questionable, at best.
By definition, a riot is "a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd." So by that definition, the Boston Tea Party was very much a riot. Neither I, nor do I think anyone on WyoNation, is defending rioting and looting. But I think those that are peacefully protesting A) have the right to do so, and B) certainly have a reason for why they are.
To suggest that this is only 1 incident is very short-sighted. This may have been the final straw that sparked these riots, but there are hundreds, thousands of incidents over the last several decades that have led to this. This didn't start with George Floyd, nor, sadly, will it end with him.
Just remember, a few bad people do not characterize an entire group. Just how not all police officers are racist, murderers; not all protesters are violent "thugs" looking to loot and riot.
If people want to peacefully protest, fine. The Boston Tea party was not violent. Tea was dumped into a harbor as a political statement. What part of that is violent? It wasn't and has never been described that way.
No, its about calling out the racist people for their actions. Calling out those that let people off the hook for these injustices. And FYI, its NOT just black people in those protests, but plenty of people of other colors as well, including white people not afraid to call out those that have warped priorities.No one suggested this was the only incident. Remember Ferguson a few years ago? Burning and looting over a incident that was falsely reported. And regarding the protests themselves: I can't disagree more. This is about calling out all white people as racist. That this a racist nation. The senate minority leader Charles Schumer said it on tv yesterday. He said nothing has changed and that this is still a racist nation regarding people of color.
I wasn't referring to you, but I've seen PLENTY on twitter and other social media defending it. Some think it's 100% justifiedWestWYOPoke said:LanderPoke said:crazy that some people are defending the violence and looting. Asinine. Everyone that can be ID'd doing a crime better be prosecuted.
Crazy that some people think that anyone is actually defending violence and looting.
I realize that my statement is hyperbole as I'm sure that someone is bound to be defending it, but we are talking about an extremely small percentage of the population; and from what I can tell NO ONE on here is defending violence and looting.
bladerunnr said:WestWYOPoke said:bladerunnr said:Asmodeanreborn said:bladerunnr said:Please tell me one instance where "riots" led to change for the better? I didn't realize that destroying personal property and looting are good things. You have some moronic views. People who want to go out in public without a mask are like drunk drivers. Yet, thugs setting cars and buildings ablaze are agents of positive change.
The Boston Tea Party is probably the first and most important one.
I'm not claiming riots are positive, nor am I supporting them. I'm claiming that sometimes they do lead to positive change, no matter how much they also ruin.
I'd normally bite on your other stuff too, but there's really no point to it. People not knowing how to control their emotions is a huge part of this mess to begin with, so I suppose I can at least try myself?
The Boston Tea party was not a 'riot". Tea was dumped into the Boston harbor in protest. Businesses were not burned and looted. I'd like to know the positive change you think is going to happen from this. The officer has been charged. There is an ongoing investigation. Minneapolis has a black police chief already. Perhaps the goal is to make all white people feel guilty over the actions of one person? We live in a country with 330 million people. To take one incident and make it indicative of the nation at large is questionable, at best.
By definition, a riot is "a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd." So by that definition, the Boston Tea Party was very much a riot. Neither I, nor do I think anyone on WyoNation, is defending rioting and looting. But I think those that are peacefully protesting A) have the right to do so, and B) certainly have a reason for why they are.
To suggest that this is only 1 incident is very short-sighted. This may have been the final straw that sparked these riots, but there are hundreds, thousands of incidents over the last several decades that have led to this. This didn't start with George Floyd, nor, sadly, will it end with him.
Just remember, a few bad people do not characterize an entire group. Just how not all police officers are racist, murderers; not all protesters are violent "thugs" looking to loot and riot.
If people want to peacefully protest, fine. The Boston Tea party was not violent. Tea was dumped into a harbor as a political statement. What part of that is violent? It wasn't and has never been described that way.
No one suggested this was the only incident. Remember Ferguson a few years ago? Burning and looting over a incident that was falsely reported. And regarding the protests themselves: I can't disagree more. This is about calling out all white people as racist. That this a racist nation. The senate minority leader Charles Schumer said it on tv yesterday. He said nothing has changed and that this is still a racist nation regarding people of color.
Well, if you believe that, then the protests make sense. Lastly, it is not a few bad people. It is thousands of violent thugs who are starting fires, looting stores, and beating innocent bystanders who want to protect their businesses.