Bohl has 4 seasons with only 2 conference wins in a FAR weaker MWC. He has two other seasons at 4-4-.bladerunnr wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 1:47 pmDC was the worst? Compared to who? He was far better than Glenn. He got us to 3d in the conference (5-2) with road wins against Air Force and San Diego st.. He got us to 2 bowl games in 5 years and he was 4-1 against csewe.ragtimejoe1 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:17 am Well, I think this has been settled. DC was the worst which forever killed anyone dare mentioning innovative offenses in WYO.
The only thing that changed, imo, is that I now consider Bohl less than or equal to Glenn rather than equal to Glenn. If Bohl didn't have Josh, he'd be firmly in the less than Glenn category.
Say what you want but it does matter to look back at WYO resources relative to conference peers and conference strength. Bohl has been positioned best in terms of resources and had the weakest conference.
Joe Glenn is the single worst coach in the last 40, maybe even 50 years of Wyoming football with the exception of Vic ( who was here only 3 years). Glenn's only winning season (7-5) was when he was 3-5 in the conference. We were 7th or 8th in the conference in 4 of his 6 years. And please stop with this relative strength argument. He lost to the worst Sonny Lubick teams. In fact Sonny was fired and then Glenn lost to his replacement - who was an enormous dud, even by csewe standards.
Glenn got a pass for the horrible Vic years. But in some ways, we were even worse under Glenn. During Glenn's last year, we were playing a qb who must have been 25 lbs overweight. Then, just to prove it was no fluke, Joe went to South Dakota and went a stellar 12-34 in 4 years. We never had worse talent on the field than the Glenn era.
Glenn had 4 seasons with 2 wins or less (1 season with 1 win). 1 season with 3 wins (not that much different than 4) and 1 season with 5 wins (Bohl had 1 5 and 1 6). Their overall conference record isn't that much different. Both rarely challenge good teams, are 50-50 with average teams, and mostly but not always beat bad teams.
You are right though, DC is right in there in with both guys in terms of wins and never beating quality teams.
So, yeah, splitting hairs. Glenn, to me, gets more leniency when judging very similar results as Bohl and DC because the MWC was that much better. I could be wrong, but seems like the ooc was a little tougher in the Glenn years as well, but I might be thinking of schedules before Glenn.
If Glenn is the worst coach in the last 40 years, Bohl is equally as bad.