How "screwed" should we really feel?

Everything Wyoming Cowboy and Mountain West football!
Post Reply
307bball
Cowpoke
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 12:08 pm

How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by 307bball » Wed Feb 12, 2020 11:18 am

My question stems from thinking about the defensive staff getting poached the last two years as well as the general state of good Wyoming coaches leaving the program for more pay/prestige at other schools.

Here is a quote from another thread:
CowboyNV wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:17 pm
Michigan State has screwed Wyoming over before. Most, if not all of you guys are too young to remember Bob Devaney, but he left Wyoming for Nebraska in 1962. He was Nebraska's 4th choice, but the other 3 guys they offered the job to turned them down, the last to do so was the coach at Michigan State. He's the asswipe who recommended Devaney for the job and the rest is history. He was 35-10-5 at Wyoming, and in his 10 years at Nebraska he was 101-20-2 with a national championship. He left coaching to become the AD at Nebraska. So, thanks to Michigan State, we lost probably the best coach we ever had. Like the others have said, anything is possible, but I have to believe Bohl would be way way down the list.
If I'm able to set aside my pro-Wyoming bias....Is it really getting screwed when you have coaches leaving for greener pastures elsewhere? Why is somebody an "asswipe" for recomending Devaney for a coaching position? Is it not on the University to make the financial commitment necassary to keep top flight coaches around?

Don't get me wrong ... it sucks to lose good coaches all the time. Or good players to the pros before their eligibility is up. In both cases though...That is not the way business is done in college sports. Coaches are only as loyal as their options....turns out so are entire programs. Do you think any MW member would not step on the corpses of the other programs if they were getting a P5 conference invite out of it? If you want to be big time...then you better start acting big time, starting with knocking off the hand-wringing about losing coaches or conference members. If the grass is greener on the other side ... then it's time to turn on the sprinklers.

American Horse
Ranch Hand
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:06 pm

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by American Horse » Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:32 pm

307bball wrote:
Wed Feb 12, 2020 11:18 am
My question stems from thinking about the defensive staff getting poached the last two years as well as the general state of good Wyoming coaches leaving the program for more pay/prestige at other schools.

Here is a quote from another thread:
CowboyNV wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:17 pm
Michigan State has screwed Wyoming over before. Most, if not all of you guys are too young to remember Bob Devaney, but he left Wyoming for Nebraska in 1962. He was Nebraska's 4th choice, but the other 3 guys they offered the job to turned them down, the last to do so was the coach at Michigan State. He's the asswipe who recommended Devaney for the job and the rest is history. He was 35-10-5 at Wyoming, and in his 10 years at Nebraska he was 101-20-2 with a national championship. He left coaching to become the AD at Nebraska. So, thanks to Michigan State, we lost probably the best coach we ever had. Like the others have said, anything is possible, but I have to believe Bohl would be way way down the list.
If I'm able to set aside my pro-Wyoming bias....Is it really getting screwed when you have coaches leaving for greener pastures elsewhere? Why is somebody an "asswipe" for recomending Devaney for a coaching position? Is it not on the University to make the financial commitment necassary to keep top flight coaches around?

Don't get me wrong ... it sucks to lose good coaches all the time. Or good players to the pros before their eligibility is up. In both cases though...That is not the way business is done in college sports. Coaches are only as loyal as their options....turns out so are entire programs. Do you think any MW member would not step on the corpses of the other programs if they were getting a P5 conference invite out of it? If you want to be big time...then you better start acting big time, starting with knocking off the hand-wringing about losing coaches or conference members. If the grass is greener on the other side ... then it's time to turn on the sprinklers.
I don't like to agree to this... but I must How many of us have recommended someone for a job? Does that make us an "asswipe?" If we are offered a job with more prestige and more money, won't nearly all of us take it? If WY truly wants to be a big dawg and do the poaching of coaches, they need to walk that walk.

OrediggerPoke
WyoNation Addict
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:57 am

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by OrediggerPoke » Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:46 pm

If our coaches weren't leaving for greener pastures than that would tell you that we have a bad program. Our coaches are in demand elsewhere for big money because we have a good program.

User avatar
WestWYOPoke
WyoNation Addict
Posts: 2859
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:35 am

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by WestWYOPoke » Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:34 pm

It's hard for most of us to fathom the world that college coaches live in. For some, they may only get 1 shot at the FBS level (obviously many never make it that far), so the mindset has to be 'me-first'. If I had a job with absolutely zero job security, I would A) hope to make a lot of money annually since it might be one-and-done, and B) jump on the chance to make more when the opportunity arises.

The only coaches that can afford (literally afford) the "luxury" of allegiance are established winners...and even then, the cost of allegiance is getting higher by the year (I.E. Les Miles at LSU).
Image

Expat_Poke
Ranch Hand
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:58 pm
Location: Under the evening shadow of the Bighorns

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by Expat_Poke » Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:42 am

Was wondering to post this here or in the MSU/CU related thread. Having good coaches poached is the nature of college football. Mid to low level "P5" teams face it with their head coaches as well, and even sometimes though more rarely a top tier program will get a head coach head hunted by other top tier college or NFL options. Also even your Alabama's have to deal with constantly having their good coordinators continually poached.

Right now I will say that the Dantonio move seems on the surface kind of a jerk move. Granted we don't know all the comings and goings in his personal life and maybe something suddenly came up that really demanded he step away when he did. Otherwise his timing really hoses two programs that have to scramble. I would say as for feeling "screwed" right now MSU and CU have more reason than us with a caveat.

I heard, and it is simply what I heard so may or may not be true, that Dickert gave Bohl a firm 2 year commitment. If that is the case my issue is less him going to greener pastures and more against him going back on his word. Commitments are supposed to mean something and shouldn't be taken lightly. The point of a commitment is considering you may get better opportunities offered, but you stick to your word (generally to someone that has given you a previous opportunity at risk to themselves). If that isn't the case, and no commitment was given, I really don't have any issue.
Returned from my 4 year exodus in Greenieville

User avatar
WYO1016
WyoNation Addict
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Cheyenne, WY

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by WYO1016 » Fri Feb 14, 2020 8:38 am

Expat_Poke wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:42 am
Was wondering to post this here or in the MSU/CU related thread. Having good coaches poached is the nature of college football. Mid to low level "P5" teams face it with their head coaches as well, and even sometimes though more rarely a top tier program will get a head coach head hunted by other top tier college or NFL options. Also even your Alabama's have to deal with constantly having their good coordinators continually poached.

Right now I will say that the Dantonio move seems on the surface kind of a jerk move. Granted we don't know all the comings and goings in his personal life and maybe something suddenly came up that really demanded he step away when he did. Otherwise his timing really hoses two programs that have to scramble. I would say as for feeling "screwed" right now MSU and CU have more reason than us with a caveat.

I heard, and it is simply what I heard so may or may not be true, that Dickert gave Bohl a firm 2 year commitment. If that is the case my issue is less him going to greener pastures and more against him going back on his word. Commitments are supposed to mean something and shouldn't be taken lightly. The point of a commitment is considering you may get better opportunities offered, but you stick to your word (generally to someone that has given you a previous opportunity at risk to themselves). If that isn't the case, and no commitment was given, I really don't have any issue.
This one is pretty easy to figure out. He was ready to retire at the end of the season, but had this nice little bonus in his contract:
Dantonio's deal remains a rollover contract through 2020, but he received a $264,000 increase in base salary to $2.26 million. His contingent annual bonus jumped from $286,000 to $700,000 with a one-time $4.3 million contingent annual bonus if he remains in his post through Jan. 15, 2020.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/261 ... s-reaction
Image

Expat_Poke
Ranch Hand
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:58 pm
Location: Under the evening shadow of the Bighorns

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by Expat_Poke » Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:53 am

WYO1016 wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 8:38 am
Expat_Poke wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:42 am
Was wondering to post this here or in the MSU/CU related thread. Having good coaches poached is the nature of college football. Mid to low level "P5" teams face it with their head coaches as well, and even sometimes though more rarely a top tier program will get a head coach head hunted by other top tier college or NFL options. Also even your Alabama's have to deal with constantly having their good coordinators continually poached.

Right now I will say that the Dantonio move seems on the surface kind of a jerk move. Granted we don't know all the comings and goings in his personal life and maybe something suddenly came up that really demanded he step away when he did. Otherwise his timing really hoses two programs that have to scramble. I would say as for feeling "screwed" right now MSU and CU have more reason than us with a caveat.

I heard, and it is simply what I heard so may or may not be true, that Dickert gave Bohl a firm 2 year commitment. If that is the case my issue is less him going to greener pastures and more against him going back on his word. Commitments are supposed to mean something and shouldn't be taken lightly. The point of a commitment is considering you may get better opportunities offered, but you stick to your word (generally to someone that has given you a previous opportunity at risk to themselves). If that isn't the case, and no commitment was given, I really don't have any issue.
This one is pretty easy to figure out. He was ready to retire at the end of the season, but had this nice little bonus in his contract:
Dantonio's deal remains a rollover contract through 2020, but he received a $264,000 increase in base salary to $2.26 million. His contingent annual bonus jumped from $286,000 to $700,000 with a one-time $4.3 million contingent annual bonus if he remains in his post through Jan. 15, 2020.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/261 ... s-reaction
If that is why he waited that long, that is a jerk move. I am speculating that Michigan State put that date in there thinking hey there is no way a coach would leave that late...

A lot of things in life are worth more than mammon
Returned from my 4 year exodus in Greenieville

TSpoke
A Real Cowboy
Posts: 1408
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:08 am

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by TSpoke » Fri Feb 14, 2020 10:01 am

Expat_Poke wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:53 am
WYO1016 wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 8:38 am
Expat_Poke wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:42 am
Was wondering to post this here or in the MSU/CU related thread. Having good coaches poached is the nature of college football. Mid to low level "P5" teams face it with their head coaches as well, and even sometimes though more rarely a top tier program will get a head coach head hunted by other top tier college or NFL options. Also even your Alabama's have to deal with constantly having their good coordinators continually poached.

Right now I will say that the Dantonio move seems on the surface kind of a jerk move. Granted we don't know all the comings and goings in his personal life and maybe something suddenly came up that really demanded he step away when he did. Otherwise his timing really hoses two programs that have to scramble. I would say as for feeling "screwed" right now MSU and CU have more reason than us with a caveat.

I heard, and it is simply what I heard so may or may not be true, that Dickert gave Bohl a firm 2 year commitment. If that is the case my issue is less him going to greener pastures and more against him going back on his word. Commitments are supposed to mean something and shouldn't be taken lightly. The point of a commitment is considering you may get better opportunities offered, but you stick to your word (generally to someone that has given you a previous opportunity at risk to themselves). If that isn't the case, and no commitment was given, I really don't have any issue.
This one is pretty easy to figure out. He was ready to retire at the end of the season, but had this nice little bonus in his contract:
Dantonio's deal remains a rollover contract through 2020, but he received a $264,000 increase in base salary to $2.26 million. His contingent annual bonus jumped from $286,000 to $700,000 with a one-time $4.3 million contingent annual bonus if he remains in his post through Jan. 15, 2020.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/261 ... s-reaction
If that is why he waited that long, that is a jerk move. I am speculating that Michigan State put that date in there thinking hey there is no way a coach would leave that late...

A lot of things in life are worth more than mammon
I don't think it was just that. If that was all it was he could have worked something out with the university and still got his bonus and put the university in a better position to hire a new coach. Not sure what else was going on but I think if it was only that bonus they would have figured something else out.

User avatar
seattlecowboy
WyoNation Addict
Posts: 3009
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by seattlecowboy » Fri Feb 14, 2020 12:57 pm

TSpoke wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 10:01 am
Expat_Poke wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:53 am
WYO1016 wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 8:38 am
Expat_Poke wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:42 am
Was wondering to post this here or in the MSU/CU related thread. Having good coaches poached is the nature of college football. Mid to low level "P5" teams face it with their head coaches as well, and even sometimes though more rarely a top tier program will get a head coach head hunted by other top tier college or NFL options. Also even your Alabama's have to deal with constantly having their good coordinators continually poached.

Right now I will say that the Dantonio move seems on the surface kind of a jerk move. Granted we don't know all the comings and goings in his personal life and maybe something suddenly came up that really demanded he step away when he did. Otherwise his timing really hoses two programs that have to scramble. I would say as for feeling "screwed" right now MSU and CU have more reason than us with a caveat.

I heard, and it is simply what I heard so may or may not be true, that Dickert gave Bohl a firm 2 year commitment. If that is the case my issue is less him going to greener pastures and more against him going back on his word. Commitments are supposed to mean something and shouldn't be taken lightly. The point of a commitment is considering you may get better opportunities offered, but you stick to your word (generally to someone that has given you a previous opportunity at risk to themselves). If that isn't the case, and no commitment was given, I really don't have any issue.
This one is pretty easy to figure out. He was ready to retire at the end of the season, but had this nice little bonus in his contract:
Dantonio's deal remains a rollover contract through 2020, but he received a $264,000 increase in base salary to $2.26 million. His contingent annual bonus jumped from $286,000 to $700,000 with a one-time $4.3 million contingent annual bonus if he remains in his post through Jan. 15, 2020.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/261 ... s-reaction
If that is why he waited that long, that is a jerk move. I am speculating that Michigan State put that date in there thinking hey there is no way a coach would leave that late...

A lot of things in life are worth more than mammon
I don't think it was just that. If that was all it was he could have worked something out with the university and still got his bonus and put the university in a better position to hire a new coach. Not sure what else was going on but I think if it was only that bonus they would have figured something else out.

That was only one part of it. Dantonio said he was planning on coaching them this next season (2020) but then he found out the administrators had hired a search firm for his replacement without telling him and he was supposed to be able to pick his replacement. So that is when he got upset and decided to resign.
Image

stymeman
Bronco-Buster
Posts: 6064
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:40 pm
Location: Cheyenne, again

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by stymeman » Fri Feb 14, 2020 5:43 pm

OrediggerPoke wrote:
Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:46 pm
If our coaches weren't leaving for greener pastures than that would tell you that we have a bad program. Our coaches are in demand elsewhere for big money because we have a good program.
Good quote but we will always be a stepping stone University, we don't have the resources to compete with the Power 5. If we did could you imagine the ticket prices(which nobody likes now) would be like??? It's just the nature of where we live and whom we love to support, enjoy the ebbs and flows as they go, anymore. Poaching of our coaches will be a forever thing

307bball
Cowpoke
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 12:08 pm

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by 307bball » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:18 am

stymeman wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 5:43 pm
OrediggerPoke wrote:
Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:46 pm
If our coaches weren't leaving for greener pastures than that would tell you that we have a bad program. Our coaches are in demand elsewhere for big money because we have a good program.
Good quote but we will always be a stepping stone University, we don't have the resources to compete with the Power 5. If we did could you imagine the ticket prices(which nobody likes now) would be like??? It's just the nature of where we live and whom we love to support, enjoy the ebbs and flows as they go, anymore. Poaching of our coaches will be a forever thing
I think we all agree on this to some extent....but this opens up another problematic line of thought. If there is a threshold of success, beyond which a Wyoming coach gets "poached", how realistic is it, as fans, to expect excellence? I know people point to Boise State as the model but that program is a bit unicorn-ish. I mean, if you get a bunch of extra money each year compared to the rest of your conference you can afford to protect your coaches a bit. If the Wyoming football program continues to rise to a certain level and get it's head (or coordinator) chopped off by a bigger program only to start over again...what is the realistic ceiling in that scenario?

I love me some Wyoming football but ever since the conference re-alignment crap I get really down about the difficulties of competing for non-powerhouse schools.

WyoBrandX
A Real Cowboy
Posts: 1703
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:01 pm
Location: Laramie, Wyoming

Re: How "screwed" should we really feel?

Post by WyoBrandX » Sun Feb 16, 2020 10:47 am

Its a long shot, but one way they could try to fight some of the attrition is to find some Wyoming guys that can be developed into great coaches. Maybe find some of the Wyoming players who don't go off the NFL, get them into GA coaching, and promote within when they master the positions.

When Bohl retires, put him on retainer as a consultant for the head coaching position. He can draw a salary, help eval talent, but not deal with the media and the day to day stuff.

Might work...

Post Reply