Schedule strength?

Everything Wyoming Cowboy and Mountain West football!
Post Reply
User avatar
whyoh
WyoNation Addict
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:00 am
Location: Casper

You hear the arguement everytime the BSBCS gets brought up and it had never settled well with me

My problem with the BCS computers is that they give ALL bcs aq schools more credit that non aq schools

ie. Beating Wash St. is worth more than beating CSU...and we would all argue that Wash St. blows

of course we would argue that because being in tcu's conference (for now) we would have something to gain from them going to the Nat. Champ game....so in order remove the bias caused by my vested interest I went to whatifsports.com and ran game simulations between MWC schools and their respective finishers in the PAC.

first i removed USC for three reasons in this order
i needed to pit 9 schools against 9 schools so one had to go
i didn't want to take the top or bottom finisher b/c that would slant the results
since USC can't play for a Championship, they were the easiest choice

then i ran the simulations
i used neutral playing fields so the simulator wouldn't give home field advantage to either team
i put each team against their respective finishers in the opposite conference

note: i had to use the 2009 rosters for these because the 2010 rosters won't be available until after the bowl season


the results


Oregon 20.........TCU 33

Stanford 3........Utah 27

Washington 27...SDSU 40

Oregon St. 33....Air Force 16

Arizona 23........BYU 25

Arizona St. 28....CSU 24

Cal 66.............UNLV 38

UCLA 37...........New Mex 36

Wash St. 10......Wyoming 31




TBH i didn't expect the MWC to win more than three of these games...instead they won the majority of them

albeit some were pretty close games but that just pounds the point home harder, imho


weaker schedule my butt
Last edited by whyoh on Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
disclaimer: I could be wrong. I've done it before...I'll probably do it again.

a high fallootin'...rootin' tootin' sonofa gun from 'ol WYOMIN'
WYCowboy
WyoNation Moderator
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Wyoming
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times

Well done - interesting.
You can tell how big a person is by what it takes to discourage him/her.
User avatar
MrTitleist
WyoNation Overlord
Posts: 10521
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: Missoula, MT
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 33 times

IMO: AFA would beat OSU, UCLA would blow out UNM.
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
MrTitleist
WyoNation Overlord
Posts: 10521
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: Missoula, MT
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 33 times

And.. Stanford would manhandle Utah, I think.
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
spindoctor02
WyoNation Moderator
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:39 pm
Location: Little Rock, AR

Well, if you were forced to use 2009 rosters, why didn't you also use the 2009 final standings?
Image
User avatar
whyoh
WyoNation Addict
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:00 am
Location: Casper

spindoctor02 wrote:Well, if you were forced to use 2009 rosters, why didn't you also use the 2009 final standings?
i dunno...geez
disclaimer: I could be wrong. I've done it before...I'll probably do it again.

a high fallootin'...rootin' tootin' sonofa gun from 'ol WYOMIN'
User avatar
whyoh
WyoNation Addict
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:00 am
Location: Casper

MrTitleist wrote:IMO: AFA would beat OSU, UCLA would blow out UNM.

if i really had the time i would have run each game like 100 times an dtaken the average scores...and things might've turned out different. i'll try again when the 2010 rosters are added we might get a more accurate representation
disclaimer: I could be wrong. I've done it before...I'll probably do it again.

a high fallootin'...rootin' tootin' sonofa gun from 'ol WYOMIN'
Post Reply