In my observation, man-for-man, on both sides of the line, TCU outmatches Wyo. Secondary: TCU more athletic. Linebackers: Wyo. Backfield: Wyo. QB: Tossup. Special teams: TCU. Kicker: Wyo. Coaching (not counting special teams and Cockhill): Wyo. It is also my observation that the bad drags down the g...

It will be COOOLD in Laramie this Saturday. A cold front is coming in. And wet. Texans that don't succum to the cold may perish from lack of oxygen. This, unfortunately, will probably not apply to the Frogs, who will likely give the Pokes warts before the day is over. But we can still hope.

My understanding was that Patrick was injured and wouldn't be playing until later in the season. Maybe he is recovering quickly but they don't want to stress the injury. I believe that he was positioned to be a starter.

The last time the Pokes got a vote in the USAToday poll, they got beat.

To be realistic, Pokes have best chance for the Campbells Soup Bowl or the Kohler Toilet Bowl.

First of all, Moore is, no question, one of the top MWC players. But, on the other hand, stats CAN lie. For example, a high batting average in baseball, does not directly correlate with high value to the team. It is when the hits come that are important, how the player reacts to clutch situations, a...

>>"Bobcat Pride": I'm already trying to figure out how I can get out West to next year's Ohio-Wyoming game >>on Labor Day weekend. Airfares seem pretty high, and I'm not afraid of a long drive with a couple of >>other Bobcat fans. Any suggestions? >> >>GO BOBCATS!!! You would fly into Denv...

Mistakes will probably make the difference with these apparently closely matched teams. With no mistakes I say Pokes score at least 17 but no more than 35, while Bobcats go at least 14 but no more than 28. Conclusion: Poke by narrow margin.

Well, we should have known it from the Virginia game -- the Poke secondary is way over-rated. The Virginia receivers were open all day but the QB couldn't connect. I'm only listening to the awful Walsh on the radio (probably matches the team, though) so I can't really see what's happening, but it so...

J-Rod, you are a man of few words. Good for you.

Ah... a Boise State grad AND and MBA. I picture the combination. And the anal-ysis.
You obviously used a common MBA tecnique - the Method of Posterior Extraction - to get your result.

Using my Method, I see the Pokes scoring at least 6 but less than 24. On the other hand, BSU will score more than 16 but less than 35. So there is a small window for the Pokes to pull one out.

Hmmm... Was it one coaches vote for a 23-rd place or three coaches votes for 25-th place? It makes a big difference. The latter vote is way more credible. I personally don't think the Pokes are ready to get any votes yet. If thinks go right this Sat., then yes, votes would be appropriate.

USU pounded it on the ground against the Pokes. BS is way way better than USU on the ground, so the Pokes are in trouble there. The USU QB didn't get that much heat either. When the CB has to be the leading tackler, too many ball carriers are getting past the Backers and the Line -- trouble. The onl...

Unusual stadium design insofar as the upper deck is much larger than the lower deck -- just the opposite of most stadiums. The spud crop should be coming in, so I would assume the the fries, at least, should be pretty good.

USU leads the series against the Pokes 34-23-4 with the record 13-13-3 for games in laramie. The 34 wins are the most USU has against any opponent ( next is 33 against BYU). Wouldn't you say it is time to continue to even the series?

Wyokie wrote:Next up: piss-poor Utah State!

That is what Michigan thought about Appalacia State

PokeNer wrote: UVA will be sucking gas by the beginning of the 4th. .

Yah, sucking gas that the Pokes passed! As long as Moore doesn't fumble and
Sween not intercepted too much, it will be close game.